User talk:Frieza-Force

From Wikiquote
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Frieza-Force, and welcome to English Wikiquote.

Enjoy! ~ DanielTom (talk) 16:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Frieza-Force: why thanks good sir! I will come here seldomly. only here cause Prince Zarbon, who is apparently known as Zarbon here and all other wikis, urged me to come to this reference site at once. Frieza-Force

Edit summaries[edit]

Thank you for your work in cleaning up pages and reverting nonsense edits. One request: please tone down your edit summaries. Please assume good faith on the part of other users and be more civil when editing. Thanks! ~ UDScott (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Unblock request[edit]

This blocked user is asking that his or her block be reviewed:

  • Frieza-Force: I never did ANYTHING wrong, unban me please. There must be a misunderstanding! Frieza-Force


  • In some cases, a user may not in fact be blocked, or their block may be expired. Please check your block log. If no blocks are listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only: If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request (please use {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification|1=Frieza-Force}} for notifying), replace this template with the following as notification.

{{Unblock on hold|1=blocking administrator|2=*'''Frieza-Force''': I never did ANYTHING wrong, unban me please. There must be a misunderstanding! [[User:Frieza-Force|Frieza-Force]]|3=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following as notification, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=*'''Frieza-Force''': I never did ANYTHING wrong, unban me please. There must be a misunderstanding! [[User:Frieza-Force|Frieza-Force]]|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the request (note that you may NOT unblock your own account), replace the unblock template with {{tlx|unblock|reason}}, and post the following directly underneath the unblock template:
{{subst:Request accepted|1=reason}}

  • Comment You never did ANYTHING wrong? What about the fake redirects (from User:Frieza Force to your page), fake userpage messages (on User talk: confusing user page messages (User talk:, removal of large article content (for example here)... etc, etc. This made me classify (all) you contributions as vandalism-only, and remove most of your edits. -- Mdd (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
    • Also recent edits (of, YODO (You Only Die Once), User:Frieza-Force|Frieza-Force) on User talk:Zarbon have been classified as vandalism (see here). This strongly suggests that these two usernames (of which one is blocked), and ip address are connected to one and the same person. Since the IP address traces back to an address in the States (just as the second ip adress later involved on User talk:Zarbon), this strongly suggests the provoking userpage info here is also fake. None of these accounts have edits beside wikiquote. -- Mdd (talk) 11:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
      • .... and User:Zarbon has a forum called Frieza Force, and you are impersonating him. -- Mdd (talk) 12:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Frieza-Force: thats all good and fine but Y-O-U deleted 2014 and the redirect WQ:ANI which wasnt vandalism. and, may i remind ya that i did heavy trimming of articles (with excessive quotes?!). So there, unblock me!!! Frieza-Force
I strongly concur with Mdd on the aforementioned assessment. This same sockpuppeteer has been attempting to impersonate me for some time now. I'm looking back at a time-frame of over 10 years. Additionally, this exact same user has likely created a slew of accounts ranging in the few hundred if not thousand within this long time span. I recommend strong care be taken at blocking this user and following up with an immediate block of any suspicious activity or newly created accounts in the near future. This has gone on long enough and I highly suggest checkuser for all the vandalism of recent. - Zarbon (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Zarbon, since you confirm my suspicions (and Frieza-Force removed your comment) this account has been blocked indefinitely, the false userpage data has been removed and the userpage has been protected. -- Mdd (talk) 11:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)