From Wikiquote

Votes for deletion is the process where the community discusses whether a page should be deleted or not, depending on the consensus of the discussion.

Please read and understand the Wikiquote deletion policy before editing this page.

• Explain your reasoning for every page you list here, even if you think it is obvious.
• Always be sure to sign your entry or vote, or it will not be counted.

Contents 1 The process 1.1 Requesting deletions 1.2 Voting on deletions 1.3 Closing votes and deleting articles 1.4 Reviewing closed votes 2 Deletion candidates 2.1 Michael Tsarion 2.2 Template:Wikipediapar 2.3 Hamid Bin Ahmad Al-Rifaie

The process

Requesting deletions

To list a single article for deletion for the first time, follow this three-step process:

I: Put the deletion tag on the article.

Insert the {{vfd-new}} tag at the top of the page. Please do not mark the edit as minor. Use the edit summary to indicate the nomination; this can be as simple as "VFD". You can check the "Watch this page" box to follow the page in your watchlist. This allows you to notice if the VfD tag is removed by a vandal. Save the page.

II: Create the article's deletion discussion page.

Click the link saying "this article's entry" to open the deletion-debate page. Copy the following: {{subst:vfd-new2| pg=PAGENAME| text=REASONING — ~~~~}}. Replace PAGENAME with the name of the page you're nominating, and REASONING with an explanation of why you think the page should be deleted. Note that the signature/timestamp characters (~~~~) are placed inside the braces {{ }}, not outside as with standard posts. Explanations are important when nominating a page for deletion. While it may be obvious to you why a page should be deleted, not everyone will understand and you should provide a clear but concise explanation. Please remember to sign your comment by putting ~~~~ at the end. Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate. Save the page.

III: Notify users who monitor VfD discussion.

Copy the tag below, and then click  THIS LINK  to open the deletion log page. At the bottom of the log page, insert: {{subst:vfd-new3 | pg=PAGENAME}} replacing PAGENAME appropriately. Please include the name of the nominated page in the edit summary. Save the page. Your insertion will be automatically expanded to the same form as the preceding lines in the file: {{Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME}}. Consider also adding {{subst:VFDNote|PAGENAME}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the article's principal contributor(s).

Voting on deletions

Once listed, the entire Wikiquote community is invited to vote on whether to keep or delete each page, or take some other action on it. Many candidate articles will have specific dates by which to vote; if none is given, you can assume at least seven days after the article is listed before the votes are tallied.

To vote, jump or scroll down to the entry you wish to vote on, click its "edit" link, and add your vote to the end of the list, like one of these:

• Keep. ~~~~
• Delete. ~~~~
• (other actions; explain) ~~~~
• Comment (not including action) ~~~~

Possible other actions include Merge, Rename, Redirect, Move to (sister project). Please be clear and concise when describing your action.

The four tildes (~~~~) will automatically add your user ID and a timestamp to your vote. This is necessary to ensure each Wikiquotian gets only a single vote. You can add some comments to your vote (before the tildes) to explain your reasons, but it is not required. However, it may help others to decide which way to vote.

Please do not add a vote after the closing date and time; any late vote may be struck out and ignored by the closing admin.

NOTE: Although we use the term "vote", VfD is not specifically a democratic process, as we have no way of verifying "one person, one vote". It is designed to "take the temperature" of the community on a subject. Sysops have the responsibility of judging the results based on a variety of factors, including (besides the votes) policies, practices, precedents, arguments, compromises between conflicting positions, and seriousness of the participants.

Closing votes and deleting articles

Sysops have the responsibility to review the list and determine what articles have achieved a consensus, whether it is for deletion, preservation, or some other action. All candidate articles should be listed here at least seven days before the votes are tallied. Many VfD entries will have "Vote closes" notices to indicate when the votes will be tallied.

• The sysop tallying the vote should add a "vote closed" header with the result of the vote, and sign it.
• If consensus is for deletion, the sysop should follow the deletion process to delete the article.
• If it is to keep, or if there is no consensus for action, the sysop should remove the {{vfd-new}} tag from the article and post a notice on the article's talk page about the completed VfD, including a link to the VfD discussion on that article. The {{vfd-kept-new}} template can be used for a standard notice.
• There may also be a vote to move (rename) or otherwise change the article. The sysop's actions will depend on the specific situation in these cases. In those cases, a notice should also be posted on the talk page documenting the decision.

To avoid conflict of interest, a sysop should never close a VfD that he or she started. However, a sysop may close a VfD in which he or she has voted.

After a reasonable time, a sysop will then move the entire entry into the appropriate month page of the VfD log. (During this transition period, some old discussions are available only in the old Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive.)

Note: In the interest of cross-wiki cooperation, please check Wikipedia to make sure their articles don't link back to an article that has just been deleted. Also de-link any other language edition articles (though if you find that daunting, EVula is more than happy to do so).

Reviewing closed votes

All closed votes will be archived indefinitely in per-month pages at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Log. (A few are still found only in the old Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive.) See that page for details.

Deletion candidates

Michael Tsarion

This subject does not appear to be sufficiently notable. (Deleted at Wikipedia for that reason.) The quotes are all from a blogspot page. — Ningauble 16:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vote closes: 17:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble 16:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 17:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Not properly sourced.--Ole.Holm 19:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Pointless page, spammy, vandalism, poorly writtened page, fanon page, the page scores number 9 at the Top Ten most worst articles list, not memorable or notable, not sourced, its one messy page, fails and violates Manuel of Style and Limit of Quotes. Also a message to the users that edit Michael Tsarion why have you created a pointless page like Michael Tsarion? Why you insist on create trouble to the Wikiquote by making a page that fails Manuel of Style and violates Limit of Quotes? You know that if any user continues to create pointless articles that violates all Wikiquote policies they might have to say farewell to their editing rights.(StarWarsFanBoy 07:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC))
• Delete per nom. - InvisibleSun 04:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Template:Wikipediapar

This template was deprecated years ago, and is no longer being used. — Ningauble 18:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vote closes: 19:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble 18:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

• Delete Pointless template.(StarWarsFanBoy 18:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC))

• Delete Is actually being used on some user and user talk pages [1] but its scarcely essential.--Ole.Holm 21:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

  These are actually mentions, not uses. I already cleaned up the last handful of pages using it when I noticed that someone used it recently. ~ Ningauble 17:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 01:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - InvisibleSun 04:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Hamid Bin Ahmad Al-Rifaie

This article was PROD because "No sourced quotes." The tag was promptly removed without curing the defect. This is unacceptable in an article about a living person. The subject may also not be sufficiently notable. (I declined a speedy delete request because notability is asserted at Wikipedia, although the claim is undermined by being written like a résumé.) — Ningauble 18:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

• Vote closes: 19:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble 18:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott 18:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. I also continue to doubt this person's notability. The WP article was flagged with {{Notability}} but this was removed by an IP in Saudi Arabia that has not edited any other article.--Ole.Holm 19:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete, Bad article and a pointless one.(StarWarsFanBoy 21:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC))