Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/Red4tribe 2
From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.
The result was: Sysop status refused. --Cato 21:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Red4tribe (talk · contributions)[edit]
I think I would be a good admin. I have brought William the Silent from nothing, to something in just two days. I will crack down on vadalisim. I thnk I could help a lot.Red4tribe 18:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ok understood, but what spelling errors? Red4tribe 18:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- vadalisim --Poetlister 19:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And thnk --Aphaia 23:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- vadalisim --Poetlister 19:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. I think it goes without saying that an admin must have more experience on the site than two days. While the page you worked on looks fine to me, you must build up a history on the site before being considered to be an admin. The fact that there are a couple of spelling errors in your request also does not bolster your case. I would suggest that you keep working and learning how the site works before requesting such a position. ~ UDScott 18:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose at present I really hate to dampen an enthusiast, and if Red4tribe can maintain enthusiasm for long enough I will be delighted to support an RfA.--Poetlister 19:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose needs some time...Modernist 00:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Red4tribe is making a very promising start. I think that he/she is likely to be admin material eventually, and would be happy to offer any advice I can to help achieve that. So please don't be disheartened by the opposes.--Cato 22:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: UDScott: is "spellling errors" deliberate? :-)
- While we have no official equivalent of w:WP:SNOW, I propose to close this request with an apparent coming conclusion on my discretion as b'crat. If there is no opposition within a day, I'll take it a sign of community approval. --Aphaia 23:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: UDScott: is "spellling errors" deliberate? :-)
- Oppose per above. Yes, a SNOW close seems appropriate.--Yehudi 08:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This request was early closed in regard of its impossibility of success. The candidate is however appreciated due to his or her enthusiasm and the ENWQ community will welcome the second nomination in a more appropriate time. --Aphaia 05:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.