Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/IOHANNVSVERVS2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.

The result was: Unsuccessful application. BD2412 T 22:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

IOHANNVSVERVS (talk · contributions) (Second application)

I have requested adminship before and was declined for want of experience. I was advised to reapply in a few months and am now doing so. —This unsigned comment is by IOHANNVSVERVS (talk • contribs) 20:28, 9 September 2015‎.

Vote ends: September 16, 2015

---

• Comment: Will none vote? IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 21:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
• Comment: For the record I am neutral at this moment because I've not interacted with this editor yet substantially from my return. In my role as b'crat, if none won't give their comment in days, and other b'crat make no action, I'll close this application this weekend. --Aphaia (talk) 17:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

• More experience wouldn't hurt (still occasionally forgets to sign), and I would expect to see more maintenance work (mainly vandalism reversion) from someone wanting to be admin, but the editor is intelligent, receptive and clearly well-intentioned, so I must !vote Support again. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose again. I appreciate the good-faith efforts; but this contributor still has not got the hang of communicating in the manner that is expected of an administrator. E.g. one should never {{prod}} an article without giving a reason[1] or edit summary[2], and when proposing to delete the work of a regular contributor[3] one should always post a note on their talk page. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.