Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/supersaiyan474
From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: Declined. Speedy close for jokey nomination. - InvisibleSun 23:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
supersaiyan474[edit]
This user should become an adminstrator his contributions arent that much but they're very nice.Dragonfable4ever 11:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
yeah! I shold become an admin. thanx Supersaiyan474 11:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This user should be blocked for falsely putting a "15,000+ edits" tag on his page (he has fewer than 50), and for stealing my .gif. The above exchange suggests a rock-and-sock connection. BD2412 T 01:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose nomination made and accepted in bad faith. Even if, as may be hoped, nominee were to learn community standards and become a valuable contributor with thousands of edits, I should permanently oppose adminship due to the blatant dishonesty noted by BD above. (The claim of 15,000 edits was actually nominee's 14th edit.) Entrust this one not with keys to the janitorial closet. ~ Ningauble 14:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree completely with BD2412 (which is a strong oppose in case that is not clear). --Herby talk thyme 15:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just close this already; no need to let this run a full term, it's obviously a bogus request. EVula // talk // 15:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.