User talk:Caswin
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Welcome[edit]
Hello, Caswin, and welcome to the English Wikiquote, a free compendium of quotations written collaboratively by people just like you!
- For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote.
- See also What Wikiquote is not for common activities that Wikiquote does not support.
- To browse Wikiquote, take a look at our browsing start page.
- Before creating new articles, consult our guide. You may practice how to edit a page at Sandbox.
- Please remember to use edit summaries when editing pages.
- When posting to a discussion, please sign with a date by writing four tildes (~~~~) and saving.
- Be bold.
To ask for advice or assistance feel free to drop by the Village Pump or ask on my talk page. Happy editing! And again, welcome! --Aphaia 27 June 2005 18:39 (UTC)
Teen Titans[edit]
(Retrieved from User talk:Supermorff)
- It was me, Caswin, yes. I split it into five sections not for layout reasons, but to reduce the size of the page. Articles too long sometimes have a hard time opening and editing on computers (mine too, so I know what it's like). I transcluded the pages back into one only because I learned how to transclude pages, and because nothing I can find seems to suggest splitting into multiple pages is a good idea on Wikiquote. Probably there needs to be a change, but I'm not ready to be that much of a trend setter myself. I'll stand by you if you think it's a good idea and go for it. -- Supermorff 13:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- You just said yourself that there was reason to split it up - too long, problems loading. On the other hand, I'm afraid I don't see how just having learned to transclude is a good idea to do it. Yes, I'd say it's a good idea. Caswin 03:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- By transcluding, the pages are less long individually. That they appear to be on one page is irrelevant. There are less problems loading each page and editing. But as I said, if you want to change things, go ahead. I won't change it back. -- Supermorff 15:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "appearing" to be on one page - I go there, and bam, they're all on one long page that does indeed take a bit longer to load. Caswin 01:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- But not when you edit, which is usually more problematic. It's not a big difference, more a halfway option, and maybe it's not ideal. That's why there's isn't just one person in charge. If you have an opinion on this then act on it. Be bold! I don't even really look at the page any more, so whatever you decide is fine by me. -- Supermorff 02:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "appearing" to be on one page - I go there, and bam, they're all on one long page that does indeed take a bit longer to load. Caswin 01:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- By transcluding, the pages are less long individually. That they appear to be on one page is irrelevant. There are less problems loading each page and editing. But as I said, if you want to change things, go ahead. I won't change it back. -- Supermorff 15:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- You just said yourself that there was reason to split it up - too long, problems loading. On the other hand, I'm afraid I don't see how just having learned to transclude is a good idea to do it. Yes, I'd say it's a good idea. Caswin 03:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)