User talk:FilmPens

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi FilmPens. Welcome to English Wikiquote.

Enjoy! Cbrown1023 talk 00:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carson Grant[edit]

I had reformatted the page on Carson Grant to conform with Wikiquote practices. You have deleted these corrections. Please see Wikiquote:Manual of style for information on how to create and maintain pages here. - InvisibleSun 22:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry for deleting your work. I was trying to bring the page up to similar information on 'Carson Grant' on Wikipedia. --FilmPens 22:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will make the corrections again. - InvisibleSun 22:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear InvisibleSun: Thank you so much. I need a mentor in some areas of understanding, may I ask you some questions? --FilmPens 03:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC) With this new information, does this change the stub & unsource status?[reply]

Another editor has correctly removed the new information. On Wikiquote pages, the introduction is a one or two-sentence statement identifying the subject of the article. If people wish to know more about the subject, they will look to the Wikipedia article. This is why we link to Wikipedia rather than duplicate what Wikipedia has already said. As for sourced versus unsourced quotes, what makes for a sourced quote is when we're told where the quote originally comes from. Is a quote by Carson Grant, for example, from an interview or a speech? Did he write it in a magazine or newspaper article? A sourced quote lets us know these things, along with the names and dates involved, so that a reader will be assured that these quotes are reliable. If a quote does not provide these facts, it is unsourced. As for stub tags, there's no consensus yet among us for how many quotes are enough to remove a stub; but it would take at least half a dozen quotes before a stub tag should be removed. - InvisibleSun 19:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I reformatted much of this page and removed many of the categories you had created - they are much too specific for WQ. generally we do not create such specific categories here. ~ UDScott 18:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wholeheartedly support all the changes which UDScott has made. Wikipedia has over 2,500,000 articles, which makes specific categories not only advisable but useful. At Wikiquote we have a little over 16,000 articles and just a small number of people who regularly work on them. It would burden our workload and our system in general if we were to refine categories to the degree that you had done. - InvisibleSun 19:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikis: Thank you for all your time and guidance you are giving me. I am still learning your needs and guidelines. --66.65.130.152 00:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]