Sarah Ditum

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sarah Ditum is an English opinion columnist and writer whose work has appeared in publications including The Guardian, New Statesman, The Times, and UnHerd. Ditum's writing has covered issues including violence against women, gender identity, parenting, British parliamentary politics and cancel culture. She also writes regular book reviews. Her book Upskirt Decade: Women, Fame and The Noughties is scheduled to be published in 2023. Ditum is based in Bath.

Quotes[edit]

  • Russell Brand, clown that he is, is taken seriously by an awful lot of young men who see any criticism of the cartoon messiah's misogyny as a derail from "the real issues" (whatever they are). The fans claim they love Brand despite the fact that he talks about women as poisoned birds of paradise, sucubus-like vultures or material accoutrements of wealth.
  • I think the fans are dishonest: the sexism is part of the sell. If you know what power feels like, even if you have ever so little of it, how many people could commit to a new order with none at all?
    The men who love Brand love him because his "revolution" promises with chirpy vagueness to overturn every hierarchy – apart from the hierarchy of men over women, which Brand specifically and concretely reinforces. In Brand’s coming kingdom, a geezer can still lay claim to his bird. That is no revolution at all.
  • In June Cancer Research UK, a charity, tweeted: "Cervical screening (or the smear test) is relevant for everyone aged 25-64 with a cervix." The odd phrasing—"everyone with a cervix" rather than "women"—was not accidental. The charity explained that it had deliberately chosen to use what it described as "inclusive language". Similarly, the campaign Bloody Good Period, which donates tampons and sanitary towels to asylum-seekers, uses the word "menstruators" rather than "women". And Green Party Women, an internal campaign group of the British Green Party, confirmed last year that its preferred designation for the constituency it represented was not, in fact, "women" but "non-men".
  • Yet rather than confront male violence or lobby the medical system, the focus of trans activism has overwhelmingly been the feminist movement, spaces and services designed for women, and the meaning of the word "woman".
    It is notable that Cancer Research UK did not test its "inclusive" approach with a male-specific cancer. Its campaign messages about prostate and testicular cancer address "men", rather than "everyone with a prostate" or "everyone with testicles".
  • Effectively, Scotland will now issue GRCs on demand. Any man who wishes to be legally recognised as a woman just has to ask. As critics of the bill pointed out, this is likely to be highly appealing to the kinds of men who particularly want access to women's spaces — otherwise known as sex offenders.
  • Holyrood could have voted for an amendment barring convicted rapists from applying for GRCs. This was rejected because, said reformers, it unfairly conflated sex offenders with trans people. I’d say the conflation happens when you make it possible for sex offenders to opt into trans status, but I’ve long stopped expecting any of this to make sense.
  • It's true that maternity throws a spanner in women's careers. But women with dependent children are actually more likely to be in work than either women or men without, so the domestic divide can't be explained that way. And there's another quirk: different research shows that mothers who out-earn their male partner shoulder an even more unequal housework burden.
    I'll repeat that, because it's objectively insane. When a man is the breadwinner, women are expected to do more of the chores. And when a woman is the breadwinner, she still ends up doing more of the chores. Because who does what inside the home bears very little rational relationship to who does what outside the home.

External links[edit]

Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about: