# String theory

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

**String theory** is a theoretical framework of physics in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. It describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other. On distance scales larger than the string scale, a string looks just like an ordinary particle, with its mass, charge, and other properties determined by the vibrational state of the string. In string theory, one of the many vibrational states of the string corresponds to the graviton, a quantum mechanical particle that carries gravitational force. Thus string theory is a theory of quantum gravity.

## Quotes[edit]

- Is string theory a futile exercise as physics, as I believe it to be? It is an interesting mathematical specialty and has produced and will produce mathematics useful in other contexts, but it seems no more vital as mathematics than other areas of very abstract or specialized math, and doesn't on that basis justify the incredible amount of effort expended on it.
- Philip Warren Anderson as quoted in: (4 January 2005)"God (or Not), Physics and, of Course, Love: Scientists Take a Leap".
*New York Times*.

- Philip Warren Anderson as quoted in: (4 January 2005)"God (or Not), Physics and, of Course, Love: Scientists Take a Leap".

- The real world as we know it happens at energies well below the Planck scale, so it is very well described by effective field theory. There is a continuous infinity of consistent effective field theories. Remarkably, only a measure zero fraction of those seem to be obtainable from string theory. These effective field theories arise as low energy descriptions of certain "vacua" of string theory, which in some approximation schemes can be thought of as solutions to the equations of motion for the compactification space.
- Frederik Denef in (2008). "Les Houches lectures on constructing string vacua".
*arXiv preprint arXiv:0803.1194*.

- String theorists, of course, continue to do whatever it is that string theorists do.
- Sheldon Glashow, Colloquium at IFIC with Sheldon Glashow and Frank Wilczek (June 2017). YouTube (9 June 2017). (quote at 24:03 of 1:35:45)

- String theory... resolves the central dilemma confronting contemporary physics—the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and general relativity—and that unifies our understanding of all of nature's fundamental material constituents and forces. But to accomplish these feats, ...string theory
*requires*that the universe have extra space dimensions. ...

Physicists have found that a key signal that a quantum mechanical theory has gone haywire is that particular calculations yield "probabilities" that are*not*within... acceptable range. For instance... infinite probabilities. ...string theory cures these infinities. ...a residual ...problem remains. In the early days ...calculations yielded*negative*probabilities ...so string theory appeared to be awash in its own quantum-mechanical hot water. ...

Physicists found that the troublesome calculations were highly sensitive to the number of independent directions to which a string can vibrate. ...if strings could vibrate in*nine*independent spatial directions, all of the negative probabilities would cancel out. ...

Kaluza and Klein provide a loophole... in addition to our familiar three... there are six other curled-up...**rather than just postulating the existence of extra dimensions, as had been done by Kaluza, Klein, and their followers, string theory**.*requires*them- Brian Greene,
*The Elegant Universe*(1999) Ch. 8 More Dimensions Than Meet the Eye.

- Brian Greene,

- Currently, string theorists are in a position analogous to an Einstein bereft of the equivalence principle. ...[A] central organizing principle that embraces ...all ...features of the theory within one overarching and systematic framework ...is still missing.
- Brian Greene,
*The Elegant Universe*(1999, 2003) Ch. 15 "Prospects."

- Brian Greene,

**To build matter itself from geometry — that in a sense is what string theory does.**It can be thought of that way, especially in a theory like the heterotic string which is inherently a theory of gravity in which the particles of matter as well as the other forces of nature emerge in the same way that gravity emerges from geometry.**Einstein would have been pleased with this, at least with the goal, if not the realization. … He would have liked the fact that there is an underlying geometrical principle — which, unfortunately, we don’t really yet understand.**- David Gross, in his interview in
*Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?*(1988) edited by P.C.W. Davies and Julian Brown

- David Gross, in his interview in

**The number 24 appearing in Ramanujan's function is also the origin of the miraculous cancellations occurring in string theory.**...each of the 24 modes in the Ramanujan function corresponds to a physical vibration of a string. Whenever the string executes its complex motions in space-time by splitting and recombining, a large number of highly sophisticated mathematical identities must be satisfied.**These are precisely the mathematical identities discovered by Ramanujan. ...The string vibrates in ten dimensions because it requires... generalized Ramanujan functions in order to remain self-consistent.**- Michio Kaku, in
*Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the Tenth Dimension*(1995) Ch.7 Superstrings

- Michio Kaku, in

**We actually have a candidate for the mind of God.**The mind of God we believe is cosmic music, the music of strings resonating through 11 dimensional hyperspace. That is the mind of God.- Michio Kaku, in Math is the Mind of God (29 December 2012)

- I have no idea whether the properties of the universe as we know it are fundamental or emergent, but I believe that the mere possibility of the latter should give the string theorists pause, for it would imply that more than one set of microscopic equations is consistent with experiment — so that we are blind to these equations until better experiments are designed — and also that the true nature of the microscopic equations is irrelevant to our world.
- Robert B. Laughlin in
*Nobel lecture: Fractional quantization*, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 71, no. 4, (1999) pp. 863–874 (quote from p. 873)

- Robert B. Laughlin in

- One can ask whether the situation today in string theory is really as favorable as it was for field theory in the early 60's. It is difficult to know. Then, of course we had many more experiments to tell us how quantum field theories actually behave. To offset that, we have today more experience and greater mathematical sophistication.
- Joseph Polchinski, in "What is string theory?" arXiv preprint hep-th/9411028 (1994)

- The most recent chapter in our new understanding of nonperturbative effects in string theory has been the incorporation of unstable branes and open string tachyons into the overall framework of the theory. It has turned out that an understanding of unstable D-branes is necessary to properly describe all D-branes. This is natural from the point of view of K-theory, where brane configurations which are equivalent under the annihilation of unstable branes are identified ... The long-mysterious tachyon instability of open string theory has finally been given a physical interpretation: it is the instability of the D-brane that supports the existence of open strings. The instability disappears in the tachyon vacuum, in which the D-brane decays. Moreover, the belief that D-branes are solitonic solutions of string theory has been confirmed: starting with the appropriate tachyonic field theory of unstable space-filling branes, one can describe lower dimensional D-branes as solitonic solutions. Lower dimensional D-branes are thereby essentially obtained as solitons of the tachyon field theory, so, in some sense, lower-dimensional D-branes can be thought of as being made of tachyons! It has also been shown that the physics of unstable D-branes is captured by string field theory, thus making it a candidate for a non-perturbative formulation of string theory capable of describing changes of the string background.
- Washington Taylor and Barton Zwiebach in: Gubser, Steven Scott & Lykken, J. D., eds. (2004). "D-branes, tachyons, and string field theory".
*Strings, Branes And Extra Dimensions: TASI 2001*. pp. 641–760. doi: . arXiv preprint pp. 3–4

- Washington Taylor and Barton Zwiebach in: Gubser, Steven Scott & Lykken, J. D., eds. (2004). "D-branes, tachyons, and string field theory".

- ... all of these caveats really work only against the idea that the final theory of nature is a quantum field theory. They leave open the view, which is in fact the point of view of my book, that although you can not argue that relativity plus quantum mechanics plus cluster decomposition necessarily leads only to quantum field theory, it is very likely that any quantum theory that at sufficiently low energy and large distances looks Lorentz invariant and satisfies the cluster decomposition principle will also at sufficiently low energy look like a quantum field theory. Picking up a phrase from Arthur Wightman, I’ll call this a folk theorem. At any rate, this folk theorem is satisfied by string theory, and we don’t know of any counterexamples.
- Steven Weinberg, (1997). "What is Quantum Field Theory, and What Did We Think It Is?". (quote from p. 8)

- From the beginning it was clear that, despite its successes, the Standard Model of elementary particles would have to be embedded in a broader theory that would incorporate gravitation as well as the strong and electroweak interactions. There is at present only one plausible candidate for such a theory: it is the theory of strings, which started in the 1960s as a not-very-successful model of hadrons, and only later emerged as a possible theory of all forces.
- Steven Weinberg, in foreword to Polchinski, Joseph (2005).
*String Theory: Volume I, An Introduction to the Bosonic String*. Cambridge U. Press. p. xiii. (pbk reprint of 1998 original)

- Steven Weinberg, in foreword to Polchinski, Joseph (2005).

**String theory at its finest is, or should be, a new branch of geometry. ...I, myself, believe rather strongly that the proper setting for string theory will prove to be a suitable elaboration of the geometrical ideas upon which Einstein based general relativity.**- "Edward Witten" interview,
*Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?*(1992) ed. P.C.W. Davies, Julian Brown

- "Edward Witten" interview,

**I would expect that a proper elucidation of what string theory really is all about would involve a revolution in our concepts of the basic laws of physics - similar in scope to any that occurred in the past.**- "Edward Witten" interview,
*Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?*(1992) ed. P.C.W. Davies, Julian Brown

- "Edward Witten" interview,

- It's been said that string theory is part of the physics of the twenty-first century that fell by chance into the twentieth century. That's a remark that was made by a leading physicist about fifteen years ago. ...String theory was invented essentially by accident in a long series of events, starting with the Veneziano model...
**No one invented it on purpose, it was invented in a lucky accident. ...By rights, string theory shouldn't have been invented until our knowledge of some of the areas that are prerequisite... had developed to the point that it was possible for us to have the right concept of what it is all about.**- "Edward Witten" interview,
*Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?*(1992) ed. P.C.W. Davies, Julian Brown

- "Edward Witten" interview,
- Generally speaking,
**all the really great ideas of physics are really spin-offs of string theory... Some of them were discovered first, but I consider that a mere accident of the development on planet earth.**On planet earth, they were discovered in this order [general relativity, quantum field theory, superstrings, and supersymmetry]... But I don't believe, if there are many civilizations in the universe, that those four ideas were discovered in that order in each civilization.- Edward Witten, as quoted by John Horgan,
*The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age*(1996)

- Edward Witten, as quoted by John Horgan,

- I feel that we are so close with string theory that—in my moments of greatest optimism—I imagine that any day, the final form of the theory may drop out of the sky and land in someone's lap. But more realistically, I feel that we are now in the process of constructing a much deeper theory than anything we have had before and that well into the twenty-first century, when I am too old to have any useful thoughts on the subject, younger physicists will have to decide whether we have in fact found the final theory.
- Edward Witten, Interview (March 4, 1998), as quoted by Brian Greene,
*The Elegant Universe*(1999) Ch. 15 Prospects.

- Edward Witten, Interview (March 4, 1998), as quoted by Brian Greene,

- String theory is not like anything else ever discovered. It is an incredible panoply of ideas about math and physics, so vast, so rich you could say almost anything about it.
- Edward Witten, as quoted by Dennis Overbye: (December 7, 2004)"String Theory, at 20, Explains It All (or Not)".
*The New York Times*.

- Edward Witten, as quoted by Dennis Overbye: (December 7, 2004)"String Theory, at 20, Explains It All (or Not)".

- Unlike a Feynman graph, which is divided into different lines, which can represent particles of different types with different masses and spins, any part of a string world sheet is equivalent to any other so "there is only one string."
**Whatever particles**there are going to be**represent different states of vibration of one basic string.**Also there are not any vertices in the string world sheet so we do not have the freedom to tell the string how to interact.- Edward Witten in Feynman Diagrams in String Theory - Edward Witten. YouTube (7 September 2016). (25:46 of 1:22:54 in video)

## See also[edit]

## External links[edit]

*The Elegant Universe*—A three-hour miniseries with Brian Greene by*NOVA*(original PBS Broadcast Dates: October 28, 8–10 p.m. and November 4, 8–9 p.m., 2003). Various images, texts, videos and animations explaining string theory.- Not Even Wrong—A blog critical of string theory
- The Official String Theory Web Site
- Why String Theory—An introduction to string theory.