Talk:Jack Terricloth
Add topicRock Against Bush Volume *Which*?
[edit]There's an error I'm not sure how best to correct. The second quote under Interviews references the band's track on the second Rock Against Bush compilation. This is indeed the question Jack was asked, and that was indeed his answer, according to the interview cited - which by Wikipedia rules would seem to make it correct to reference.
The problem is W/IFS *wasn't on* the second Rock Against Bush comp. Their track, The Expatriate Act, was actually on the *first* volume, as can be seen on the disc's Wikipedia page, as well as the discogs.com page, and the back of the CD itself, which I still have my old copy of buried in a box somewhere in this disaster area. So how does the situation get treated when the citation conflicts with facts stated elsewhere on Wikipedia? It would be a shame to drop a great (and, apparently, accurate) quote just because the surrounding details are a little muddled.
(I also updated the interview link, which was just pointing to an index of articles. It would probably be best to include a Wayback link too, as Pastepunk has been inactive since 2012 and the site probably won't stick around forever, but I wasn't sure about best practices for that either, so I'll leave it for sharper minds to sort out)
-Bats