Talk:Clyfford Still

my edit of the page

I corrected two glaring usage errors in this article, and immediately another editor changed my corrections back to the incorrect and wrong uses. That's ridiculous. If you aren't qualified to edit, don't edit. The usage errors were incorrect grammatically and wrong in fact because they were never said by Still. Theoldestmanintheworldmaybe (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Yeah. Maybe if you hadn't bragged about your PhD in the edit summary you wouldn't have been taken for a troll/vandal. As I explained on my talk page, when you changed "truly vision" to "true vision", I checked the cited source and didn't see "true", so I reverted you. (I have now changed it to its correct version, "truly free vision".) But again, my apologies for the confusion. ~ DanielTom (talk) 02:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)