Talk:David Cameron

From Wikiquote
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Cameron page.


satirical "quote"[edit]

Keep seeing this. anyone have a good source? "Things got a bit out of hand & we'd had a few drinks. We smashed the place up and Boris set fire to the toilets" David Cameron,Oxford,1986

http://asitc.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/david-cameron/ says its in Oxford Book of Quotations

—This unsigned comment is by 87.127.117.246 (talkcontribs) .
I have not checked out the matter myself, but an anon IP briefly removed the above query with the comment: "the source claims it as satire, so it is fake." ~ Kalki (talk · contributions) 18:17, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Just followed the above link, and the "quote" clearly seems to have been debunked as fake — if it is indeed widely circulated it should perhaps be posted in a "MIsattributed" section. ~ Kalki (talk · contributions) 18:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

hoodies[edit]

lots of actual quotes about hoodies http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5163798.stm

—This unsigned comment is by 87.127.117.246 (talkcontribs) .

HE IS A BELLEND. LEAVE THE QUOTE THEFUCK ALONE!

—This unsigned comment is by 92.43.64.72 (talkcontribs) .
I am sure your astute observations of circumstances can be appreciated by someone. What service or disservices such assertions might provide to this project is beyond my ability to express any clear decisions upon. Had I not been stripped of the use of admin tools over a year ago, we never would have been blessed with such gems of wisdom, for I would surely have already blocked this IP for disruptive activities. ~ Kalki (talk · contributions) 12:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Shut up faggot. Most of what you write, although seems literate, makes no sense at all.

—This unsigned comment is by 92.43.64.72 (talkcontribs) .
Your assertions, rude, crude, and pointless as they are, are far more refreshing to me than the dishonest, duplicitous hypocrisies of those who use rules, or pretensions to the use of rules, which actually do not exist, to actually obstruct and damage some of my abilities to serve this project and the ideals which have long been evident within it far more than your rather vapid and vacuous words ever could. Such damage might go on indefinitely, were such impulses not eventually meet with the stern and justly harsh opposition of principled dissent. ~ Kalki (talk · contributions) 13:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)