Wikiquote talk:Requests for adminship/Miszatomic (removal)

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Miszatomic and Wiki-star[edit]

Note that Checkuser data would be stale for Wiki-star (talk · contributions), but behavioral evidence correlation is quite strong:

  1. Wiki-star (talk · contributions) =
  2. Miszatomic (talk · contributions) =

-- Cirt (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Comment: I have a strong belief that Wiki-star (talk · contributions) = Miszatomic (talk · contributions). Like I said, above, the Checkuser data on Wiki-star (talk · contributions) would be stale, as that user last edited over seven (7) years ago, in 2007. So we have only to compare behavioral evidence and DIFFs between the two users and their various confirmed sock accounts. They seem to behave in remarkably similar ways, if not the exact same patterns. -- Cirt (talk) 13:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Compare Wiki-star (talk · contributions) get on with our gay lives! with Miszatomic (talk · contributions) created page with "faggot" -- Cirt (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
really, thats all you got?, ironically, the more you post, the less guilty Misza looks...speaking of "behavioral evidence", there is not a single similarity between Misza and Wiki-star, infact, WS is obsessed with DragonBall/Anime and Misza has never edited an article related toDB on enwiki, infact he is more into history and football (the european kind)..I don't need a checkuser to tell you that either are the same..the only vandalism posted by one of Misza's sock thus far is that "faggot" on that vandal's talkpage which honestly is a dumb reason for a block, technically, it is you who has abused his rights by "jumping the gun" and Hounding Misza, and regarding the Jody account, I already made its abundantly clear that its definitely a misunderstanding. I'd ask you to cease and desist as you seem to be getting involved a bit too heavily on this here and on enwiki and meta....--Stemoc 13:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • "Resemblance" is often thoroughly subjective. We have yet to hear from Miszatomic on the extended claims, i.e., the "troll socking." I'm seeing a lot be based on a Wikipedia checkuser report that looks, so far, thoroughly improper to me, it should have been declined. Doesn't mean it's wrong. I ask Cirt to stop the hysterics, the rapid presentation of data to a community that doesn't necessarily want it. I was banned on Wikipedia, if one traces it back, for confronting administrative abuse, and I never went nearly as far as Cirt has gone. Cirt's filing of this removal was, my view, premature. Miszatomic might, for example, elect to resign. Cirt is making it a major confrontation presenting every fact he finds in the most negative possible light. AGF has been completely lost.
  • Cirt,, on User talk:Miszatomic is behaving like an abusive police investigator who corners a suspect and demands the suspect tell him everything. He has already taken over User:Miszatomic with one of those badges of shame. Cirt should not be Miszatomic's interrogator, and admins who behave this way have, in the past, taken the WMF into legal risk. It becomes a crusade, with the crusader completely certain he is right and correcting wrongs must be done now. complainant, investigator, judge, jury, and executioner all rolled into one. He would have had the admin bit removed unilaterally, at meta. Wisely, as I'd expect, the stewards deferred to the community.
  • That is not to excuse the apparent behavior of Miszatomic. I am confident that the Wikiquote community will address it, especially when the shouting dies down. --Abd (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)