I disagree with the prod. (I think Evalyn Gates is quotable, and I don't see the harm in keeping this article.) ~ DanielTom (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, I first checked if I could improve this article myself, but found no (notable) quotes in secondary sources. Then I also found that the current quote is from, what seems to be, the current newsletter (spring 2013) of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, which is not available online. If you do find more suitable work/quotes, please add it to the article and remove the prod-nomination. -- Mdd (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Mdd. I hear what you say, but I don't have to "improve" or find others quotes myself to save this article from deletion, because this article already has one (in my opinion) "notable" quote. And one is enough. ~ DanielTom (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
P.S. I was kidding, but actually I think it's important to only delete hopeless pages, which is not the case here.
Ok, thanks for your contributions. I removed the prod-nomination. Moving the article was a good thing, which made me noticed she participated in several high cited articles (see here). -- Mdd (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
No problem, thank you too. ~ DanielTom (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)