User talk:DeirgeDel

DeirgeDel is an alternate account of Djm-leighpark and is in a process that is planed to see Djm-leighpark renamed and quiesced DeirgeDel taking over everything Djm-leighpark used to do. This is primarily by some difficult touch points occurring on Commons and Wikidata which in event or a dispute etc. would not be helpful. I'm also needing to present a consist name on meta, mediawiki, phabricator, flcikr, and github for some upcoming stuff. I have determined February 2023 is the best time to make that change. Thankyou for your understanding and I apologise consequences that might be felt here. Thankyou.

---

Please add new threads at the bottom of the page. Please to not reply above this line, it will be moved down

---

Any questions?

If you have questions or concerns feel free to ask them here, but be aware I may choose not to answer or to only answer briefly. thankyou. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 22:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Apologize

Hi DeirgeDel, I tried very hard to address your criticism over at AN, but I have a problem on ENWQ when I use the reply-to tool, that changes what I write whenever I add text. I hope I am making sense? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

@Ottawahitech: I have had trouble with the reply tool on another Wiki and on an edit here on enWQ his morning my browser was "helpfully" coerced into making a double/triple repeat edit... (the workaround was to hit the cancel button). At the meeting WMF the other dudes were muttering about bugs in the vector skin and while this is not on vector here maybe some common stuff is changing.. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 16:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your verbal attacks

DeirgeDel -Your verbal attacks are absurd, paranoid, hateful & revealing. You, Antudrus, HouseofCHange & Feiwren seem to be on the same team. It seems your are either consciously or unconsciously pushing a pov here. Let's Assume good faith- & make No personal attack please.
Some might view your input as you doing what you must to get a paycheck & great benefits. Is that true? Are you a pawn in the "Information dominance game of Command & control to keep the people dumbed down & obedient to a bunch of tyrants?
If so, can't you see that you/they are on the wrong side of history? That cheaters never win & that winners never cheat? :-D 184.4.82.218 15:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 16:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Does a (your) supervisor will tell you what to say? ;-) Wondering. Have a good day. 184.4.82.218 17:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 17:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Piet Emmer

I am not frustrated, but the reason why the page was nominated (because it did not have an English Wikipedia page) has been resolved, Emmer's page on the English Wikipedia has been approved, so the reason for the discussion has become invalid... Thus the discussion page and box can be removed... No? TheRoyalTrust (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Once again, please do not remove VFD tags. If you continue to disrupt the VFD process by removing the notice before the discussion has concluded then you will be blocked from editing Wikiquote. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 01:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

That is not an answer to my question. TheRoyalTrust (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

@TheRoyalTrust@DeirgeDel Okay, okay, no need to argue, no arguing. I have solved it per clearly consensus to keep Since it should be ended in February but lagged till now. Problem solved Lemonaka (talk) 02:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry if i seem to be blunt, that was not my intention, thanks for the effort. TheRoyalTrust (talk) 04:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm really annoyed this argument was brought here. I had really hoped the edit summary at Special:Diff/3264255 would have meant TheRoyalTrust, who is an experienced enough editor, would have taken a discussion to a suitable independent board rather than harrassing me here. I have some complex RL issues that have come up today. @Lemonaka: Please be aware of your good faith comment "Okay, okay, no need to argue, no arguing" might be detrimental to my enWP UTRS appeal #70412. I admit I must look up the procedure for handing {{Vfd-new}} which I may not precisely have followed; though my intentions here were to avoid TRT from not being blocked. I think you know I've raised this as a case at Wikiquote:Administrators' noticeboard#Consequences of failure to do timely administration which hopefully will lead to changes in practice to avoid this sort of issue happening. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 08:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

@DeirgeDel I have contacted El_C for your block on English Wikipedia, if this content dispute is complex and messy, I'd like to commit that I lack the competence of solving this . Lemonaka (talk) 11:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

@Lemonaka: I can see you've elected to take a wikibreak because of how you've chosen to become involved here and outcomes. I don't know what you've seen/done but its easily possible to get your head messed up trying to follow it. Plus you'd need to be aware of some stuff that is in restricted access tickets. If you want laugh then please find a way to get shot of the my image contribution to ja:ルアス and zh:都柏林轻轨 as the Chinese and Japanese are touristing to Dublin and getting fined as they think the LUAS is free! More seriously chill, and if I lose my UTRS appeal its not your fault so please don't be collateral damage - your're contributions and work is much needed here. But just come back when you feel sensibly enabled to. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 21:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

@DeirgeDel Okay, here's my solution. If you have conflicts about the content in another project, please resolve the dispute in that project. Whether you are harassed, or banned, I'm not a cross-wiki admin, and even if I sympathized with you I wouldn't be able to fix the problems there. What I say here can only be responsible for this project, and I can not seek mediation for your cross-project conflicts.
As for the deletion issue here, yes, I admit that there has been a lot of backlogs, but the problem is that some topics obviously have no consensus, such as the first one. Until March of this year, still had no clear results, so the best way is to put it there for them to discuss, or to close the discussion? And for some VFDs, almost no one participated in the discussion, only the initiator voted to delete, what can we do to speed up the progress? After all, in most cases, one person is not a consensus。
Regards, Lemonaka (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

@Lemonaka: For the record in my opinion your're currently making a shedload of minor rookie sysop mistakes. For starters I now identify as DeirgeDel. I've laid off pointing that out as you are claiming you are on a Wikibreak yet still editing through it. I've respected that Wikibreak by not pinging you yet you are the one who has broken it. The VfD's do not need a massive contribution. If only the nominator has voted delete then after 7 days the community have accepted that, delete it. There's always deletion review. What is wrong is if an undiscussed PROD is not promptly restored at DRV or a reason given why not. OK I've now noticed w:en:Special:Diff/1144564149 so I thought you were recusing but now your not recusing cause you're pinging me here. And you have indicated you do not sympathise with me. Why not? I fundamentally do content. I fundamentally try to save stuff. I try my best to go for verificability and trying to avoid undue platforming of biased postions. I try to prevent vandalism. I spent an hour to day trying to work out if the're are one or three relevant "Gilbert Mercier" and which one's are notable and are they linked and which are relevant for a Wikidata item. And then there's death obsessions. Should I challenge the "last linges" articles that people keep showing here. Should I support it my applying appropriate support via Wikidata items? Anyway please either take a wikibreak and recuse or come off Wikibreak. Hope you sleep better than I do. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 01:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)