Jump to content

User talk:Deskana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiquote

Hi, Deskana. Welcome to English Wikiquote.

Enjoy! – RyanCross (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I show up here today, wonder why I have new messages, then discover they're months old. How sad :-( --Deskana 19:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

help to wikipedia

[edit]

long term abuse multi account (Zhilbert Aghajanian) in enwiki / Notify to managers

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Zhilbert (master account)

and socks:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Modern_Sciences

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Luckie_Luke (use now)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Blackorwhite

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Europe2009

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/World_Cup_2010

Please send him a new report and request a review. That's the only help you can make. The facts will soon be clear. thanks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

There are certainly many more undiscovered accounts. I was informed that he would receive money for the articles. Please be aware and all accounts must be closed globally. Blocked in English and Arabic and another language endless. His accounts have been blocked due to untrue and racist content.

please create Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations for Zhilbert

[edit]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

It is assumed to have many other accounts. She has Pan-Armenian tendencies and is therefore blocked on three wikis. It is necessary to have a thorough investigation and to close all of his undiscovered and uncovered accounts. He is supported by his friends on the Persian Wikipedia. He gets paid for articles. Due to the interest of the managers of Persian Wikipedia, he is not prevented from doing so. He must be investigated for widespread violations of regulations. If you start the investigation I will give you more information. I have clear evidence for these.


i mean to move this item to admin page and check user. He is a sabotage user and an Armenian hybrid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Modern_Sciences He is not here to help Wikipedia. See the link above that was blocked due to incorrect Armenian information. It is also blocked in Arabic and another language. It has been blocked several times in Farsi but temporarily. All Persian Wikipedia administrators are aware of his violations in all wikis, but they hide and deny it because of the money involved. Please deal with this in particular.

@Omtoddia: I'm not a checkuser anymore. Anyway, people are unlikely to accept a checkuser request made on a wiki different from the one in question. There's normally a reason why people make requests on different wikis, such as being banned on the English Wikipedia or having exhausted the process so that nobody listens anymore. If you want to make a checkuser request, make it on the English Wikipedia. --Deskana (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes i agree with you. But I have a compelling reason. This user is supported by the top administrators of Persian Wikipedia. Money is at stake. The user is supported by one of the administrators and removes or deflects the discussion if I make it to the English wiki. The problem was that I was blocked for a small matter four years ago and these people accused me of breaking the rules. However, this user who is a friend of his own has repeatedly violated the law in 2019 and 2020 (not many years ago). My point was that if the laws were to be followed, everyone had to be equal before the law and justice was to be done. But these people prevented me from hearing my voice.

I ask you to help me bring justice against wicked Wikipedian. I do not have to create an account in English according to your own rules. So I ask that you report this user to the admins who has the authority to review it now. Because I can't.

hope you help and report this offending user to investigate. There is also ample evidence of ducks(WP:DUCK). Edited most articles with multiple accounts. The top executives of the (FA)(persian) wiki are aware of his violations. This is a blatant and widespread abuse.

Thank you so much

@Omtoddia: No. In my last message, I said everything that I had to say. Expect no further response from me. --Deskana (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


No matter. Because the scandal of Persian Wikipedia is soon to be universal. The Wikipedia Foundation will soon have to respond to public opinion around the world. A text published yesterday by a Persian-language reporter has revealed the depth of corruption. You contributed to this corruption by not helping you or not doing your job. Wait for the big scandal case. Jimmy Wales will soon have to answer a lot.

goodbye forever.