User talk:Eleonorahon

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for your effort to contribute to our project, but Wikiquote is not an encyclopedia: it is a compendium of quotations. Articles without quotations, such as essays or biographies, will be deleted. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our compendium of quotations. Thanks. ~ UDScott (talk) 00:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks; means I have to be more brief and only made a general texte about some topics - in this case, plein air, linked with Normavisionsolar ? Eleonorahon (talk) 00:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok ubnderstand...will do purely Quote next time, thank you! Eleonorahon (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note your recent comments on the talk page of Norma De Saint Picman and for thanking me for speedie nomination but replying there is pointless both could be deleted at any moment. In terms of required layout please observe Wikiquote:Guide to layout. Oh ... you've just disruptivedly removed my {{Db}} template yourself so your on a high probably of being blocked so there's no point me talking further to you. And while I'm at it I'd note that while an associated English Wikipedia article exists my incomplete BEFORE indicates it might not survive an AfD. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 07:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing I believe you may have been entitled to remove the Speedy notice and the onus may have been on me to raise a VfD. I also appreciate you may have attempted to raise the unsuccessfully VfD yourself. In that respect I have strcuk what looked to be a vote on the article page as it is misleading. Thankyou. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 09:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Norma De Saint Picman[edit]

A page that you have been involved in editing, Norma De Saint Picman, has been listed for deletion. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the nomination for deletion (see also what Wikiquote is and is not). If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Norma De Saint Picman. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Thank you. User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 09:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spam at Art[edit]

Wikiquote is for quotations. Adding unrelated external links to Wikiquote pages is considered vandalism. Wikiquote is NOT a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of links. If you continue to use Wikiquote for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. ~ Ningauble (talk) 22:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Norma De Saint Picman Sanctus Dei[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Norma De Saint Picman Sanctus Dei, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikiquote is not" and Wikiquote's deletion policy).

You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Votes for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ Ningauble (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you want to appeal this block, add the following tag: {{unblock|your reason here ~~~~}}
If using the above tag does not help, an administrator may have declined the request after the unblock request was reviewed by an administrator.

Per #Spam at Art and your recent contributions, you are clearly not here to build, but only to spam your site. Thus, you have been blocked indefinitely. If you want to appeal this block, please follow the notice. Lemonaka (talk) 10:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

email read, please don't email me further, it is unnecessary for requesting unblock by using emails. I didn't revoke your talk page access. Lemonaka (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eleonorahon (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

adding original content is a also part of edition process, asking for Art and literature instructed editor

Decline reason:

For your sock puppetry on English Wikipedia, I have no faith in unblocking you. In addition, I've reported it to m:SRG for your cross-wiki abuse. Lemonaka (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Eleonorahon (talk) 14:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eleonorahon (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I am editing and contributing original content, see also Nora De Saint Picman, Nataša Pičman references

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Eleonorahon (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]