User talk:Om777om

From Wikiquote
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Ottawahitech in topic THANK YOU
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is Om777om's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Om777om.



Hi OM777om,

This is the first time (I think), that I have been able to thank you for all the work you have done here. Today I was working on updating AOC, an article you started before I became a contributor here. It is an unusual wq-article, at least when it comes to the about section, because it is sorted chronologically instead of alphabetically, something that I thought was a good idea when I started here IIRC, but now I find confusing I assume because, I have gotten used to wq-tradition.

The reason I stopped by today is arghhh-the Guardian, which cut off my access to an article about AOC prematurely so I was unable, at least temporarily, to add more quotes. This made me stop and check the contribution history to see why this article developed the way it did and this is when I saw that you were the creator of the AOC page.

It is a real shame that you cannot share your thoughts on this, and many other topics concerning the history of pages on enwq. I hope you visit this page sometimes and see that, at least some of us, appreciate the work you have done. THANK YOU.Ottawahitech (talk) 13:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Om777om (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)

Request reason:

With all due respect, I understand the issues that have been raised, and will if given the opportunity, make it a point to work very hard to avoid all conflicts with admins here. I am very sorry that GMG saw my responses as "ridiculous and unwarranted assessments... " and am also very sorry if anyone felt offended. If you will unblock me, i will modify my behavior and strive to avoid anything that any admin would according to the rules be justified in calling: problematic behavior. Am now more aware than ever, that admin's warnings (as opinionated & biased as a few of them may seem to some) must be taken seriously. Furthermore, if admins reviewing this want me to, i will upon request document some of the allegations made against me, that IMO are disputable, and explain why. Thank you for listening. Om777om (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

There is no evidence in this appeal that you understand the reasons why you are blocked. Offering to dispute the reasons does not indicate that you will not do it again. Removing most of what was posted on your talk page since the block (including the blocking notice itself) is not an indication of good faith. See w:Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for advice. ~ Ningauble (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Thanks Ningauble... whatever you all want is perfectly fine with me. I won't beg or try to change anyone's mind. If your views/judgements speak for the leaders/authorities of this project, then it's definitely best for me to stay away. Unquestioning obedience is not for me. Best wishes. Om777om (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I really miss you and hope you'll come back soonǃ--Risto hot sir (talk) 23:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey


RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey


RMaung (WMF) 19:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey


RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply