The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.
I am nominating EVula to be a candidate for checkuser permissions. EVula was successfully nominated on this project to admin (discussion) and bureaucrat (discussion). EVula already serves in trusted capacities as an oversighter at English Wikipedia  and Simple English Wikiquote , and member of the Wikimedia OTRS team  – in addition to roles as admin and/or bureaucrat at multiple other projects . I think that Wikiquote could use another checkuser, and I feel that EVula would be a fine addition to the checkuser team here at this project.
Candidate's acceptance: I accept. We could use another CU, and I'm active enough that I can jump on requests fairly quickly. EVula// talk // ☯ // 18:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Vote ends: 19:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC) (can stay open longer than 2 weeks if need be)
Per m:Checkuser#Access_to_CheckUser, candidate must receive consensus (at least 70%-80% in pro/con voting), and at least 25-30 editors' approval, to be considered for promotion.
Support - From the little experience I have here I already thought you were one. I must be equivocating bureaucrat with checkuser :) . . . ; anyway, from what I've experienced so far, you're qualified. Peace and Passion ("I'm listening....") 21:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Trustworthiness already shown. Ty 00:55, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.