Hello, 8gguj8, and welcome to the English Wikiquote.
- For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote.
- See also What Wikiquote is not for common activities that Wikiquote does not support.
- To ask for help or to talk with another editor, visit our Village pump.
- To browse Wikiquote, take a look at our browsing start page.
- Before creating new articles, consult our guide. You may practice how to edit a page at Sandbox.
- Please remember to use edit summaries when editing pages.
- When posting to a discussion, please sign with a date by writing four tildes (~~~~) and saving.
- Be bold.
You have reverted an edit I just made that restored a page to the state at which had existed before a massive amount of recent deletions occurred with no clear explanation as to why. I am again restoring it to a prior state, and if any material that might have recently been added is lost this can be specified and retained, if appropriate, but unjustified deletions of sourced quotes is generally considered vandalism here, and regularly reverted as such. ~ ♞☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 11:17, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
¿ ⨀ ?
Please stop removing sourced content from Wikiquote. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox.
Wikiquote exists for the collecting of notable quotations of famous people and famous works. For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote, and also What Wikiquote is not for a list of common activities that Wikiquote does not support.
When people are not interested in responsibly contributing to the development of the project incidents of their deliberate vandalism can result in IP addresses or usernames being blocked from editing.
You removed much material once again with the comment "Novelty is density (usable information is condensed information)" I will state that information removal is NOT a contribution to information density, it is simply the acts of the irrationally dense. I am well aware of such processes occurring in the deliberately and obliviously vandalistic acts of others, and do not welcome it nor condone it.
I suspect that you are merely being a disruptive troll, but on the off-chance that you are in any way sincere, I will present a challenge: When you are able to explain ALL this symbol means and can mean to anyone and everyone without use of any words, then I will concede that your abilities to communicate without the use of words are superior to my own or those of any normally intelligent human being. Until then stop attempting to disrupt, constrain and control how others choose to attempt to communicate to those of various levels of intellectual and moral perceptivity — such tendencies are all too common as it stands. ~ ♞☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 11:42, 22 September 2012 (UTC) + tweak