User talk:Sigehelmus

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, Sigehelmus, and welcome to the English Wikiquote.


Information.svg Thanks for experimenting with Wikiquote. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikiquote:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will normally be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our compendium of quotations. For a quick overview of what Wikiquote is, read Wikiquote:Wikiquote, and also What Wikiquote is not for a list of common activities that Wikiquote does not support.

I have reverted several of your edits, but do not have time to deal with all the reasons right now, as I must be leaving, but I will note that even if by "Jewish elite" one simply means any Jew who wouldn't be an abject slave to Nazi will, most people can acknowledge that the Nazis carried out a suppressive and eventually genocidal campaign against Jews generally, and not merely a Jewish elite. ~ Kalki·· 00:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

OH yeah, there's no possible way you can possibly have a political bias or delusion of any sort after looking at your page. Down with the state! *tips fedora* --Sigehelmus (talk) 05:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I have never sought to deny or hide the fact that I definitely do have a bias for honesty, and fairness, and broad toleration of diverse ideas, and honestly do have an extreme contempt for the foulest forms of fascism which disregard such "quaint notions" that honesty and fairness are ever to be defined by anything but their hate-filled assumptions and agenda. I am against most forms of absolutism, whether promoted with authoritarian or nihilistic tacts or tactics, such as I have noted since childhood actually feed off of each other, and the worst extremes of nihilist and authoritarian agenda providing support for each other against moderate and moderating forms of reason and wisdom. I do not always tend to point out many psychological and sociological facts of which I am very aware, but I am not always inclined to be extremely polite to those clearly promoting or cosmetically camouflaging various forms of extremely foul and fraudulent fascist agenda. I don’t have much more time to spend here, and will be gone much of the day (as will likely be the case most days this week). So it goes Blessings. ~ Kalki·· 08:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC) + tweaks
So you admit you're a sham whose only goal is to promote an agenda online, right? And that you could care less about the truth? Stop with the pseudo-intellectual fluff and talk practically. You're a "Christian" anarchist and you just want everyone to agree with your narrow worldview. You think just because you spend your days on Wikipedia, you have any right to spread propaganda?--Sigehelmus (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

That you are so obviously being an asinine pretentious sham, clearly talking nonsense with very poor and mistaken knowledge of me and much else in this world makes the confidence with which you make your presumptive, shallow and quite wrong assessments and assertions all the more ridiculous. I don’t usually get all that greatly alarmed at being honestly criticized by people who actually know a great deal of what they are talking about, and are rationally coherent, still less by people who quite obviously don’t, and aren't. The absurdities of some of your quite blind, stupid, and false presumptions I believe are quite easily evident and laughable to others with long familiarity with me here, and not just to myself.

My interests and respect extend to many forms of faiths and sciences, and my edits here over thousands of pages upon many broad philosophies reflect that. I accept, recognize and respect a broad range of faiths, but I have never accepted many of the shallow and presumptuous efforts at "official" formulations of creeds of faith all that seriously, having a broad range of mystical and rational insights which transcended any of the rather narrow minded and shallow pigeon-holes and categories that are normally presented to people in regard to relgions. ANY agenda I have in life is ALWAYS allied with a devotion to Truth, and I have far less alarm than most at letting ignorant and confused bigots show much of their character and delusions in making very poor assessements.

Many of your assertions indicate both ignorance, errors and shallowness of thought (including, here and elsewhere, the relatively minor error of calling this project Wikipedia), but the last question you make is quite laughable and extremely hypocritical, coming from someone who posted a link to a 7000 line collection what can be accurately summarized as extravagant claims and assertions about worldwide conspiracies and oppressions by the Zionist overlords of the Earth. I will now stop here, and will respond to other comments you have made upon my own talk page. ~ Kalki·· 01:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)