Wikiquote:Requests for adminship/Iddo999 (inactivity discussion)

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.

The result was: no consensus to remove administrative rights at this time. BD2412 T 19:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iddo999 (talk · contributions)

Starting discussion here to remove Admin flag, unfortunately, due to over four (4) years of inactivity.
Zero activity on Wikiquote since 2010 [1]. Oddly, zero contributions, ever, to English Wikipedia.
Currently holds Admin flag [2].
User notified via email about query regarding inactivity.
Queried by BD2412 about inactivity DIFF, but no response.
I also notified the user at his user talk page on en.wikipedia DIFF.
Please vote with "Remove" or "Keep".

Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vote ends: 2015·02·23 (23 February 2015)

Remove

Remove, as nominator, per above. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - 4 years of inactivity is probably enough to consider that the editor is not going to return anytime soon. OccultZone (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Keep – I don't think inactivity is a good enough reason to remove someone's adminship. The likelihood of any account being compromised is almost zero (and, should it happen, it is easily noticed). ~ DanielTom (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep · I have stated elsewhere, with such a small community, the process of removing adminship for simple lack of activity is not something I find either desirable or necessary. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 23:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Note: In this case to sum up we have: No activity for four (4) years, no response to inactivity query by BD2412. And, oddly, zero contributions, ever, to English Wikipedia. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Threaded discussion moved to talk page. -- Cirt (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Village Pump notified, with link to this discussion page. -- Cirt (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new topic on this or other appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this text.