Wikiquote:Votes for deletion

From Wikiquote
(Redirected from WQ:VFD)
Jump to: navigation, search

Votes for deletion is the process where the community discusses whether a page should be deleted or not, depending on the consensus of the discussion.

Please read and understand the Wikiquote deletion policy before editing this page.

  • Explain your reasoning for every page you list here, even if you think it is obvious.
  • Always be sure to sign your entry or vote, or it will not be counted.


The process

Requesting deletions

To list a single article for deletion for the first time, follow this three-step process:

I: Put the deletion tag on the article.
Insert the {{vfd-new}} tag at the top of the page.
  • Please do not mark the edit as minor.
  • Use the edit summary to indicate the nomination; this can be as simple as "VFD".
  • You can check the "Watch this page" box to follow the page in your watchlist. This allows you to notice if the VfD tag is removed by a vandal.
  • Save the page.
II: Create the article's deletion discussion page.
Click the link saying "this article's entry" to open the deletion-debate page.
  • Copy the following: {{subst:vfd-new2| pg=PAGENAME| text=REASONING — ~~~~}}. Replace PAGENAME with the name of the page you're nominating, and REASONING with an explanation of why you think the page should be deleted. Note that the signature/timestamp characters (~~~~) are placed inside the braces {{ }}, not outside as with standard posts.
  • Explanations are important when nominating a page for deletion. While it may be obvious to you why a page should be deleted, not everyone will understand and you should provide a clear but concise explanation. Please remember to sign your comment by putting ~~~~ at the end.
  • Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate.
  • Save the page.
III: Notify users who monitor VfD discussion.
Copy the tag below, and then click  THIS LINK  to open the deletion log page. At the bottom of the log page, insert:
{{subst:vfd-new3 | pg=PAGENAME}}

replacing PAGENAME appropriately.

  • Please include the name of the nominated page in the edit summary.
  • Save the page. Your insertion will be automatically expanded to the same form as the preceding lines in the file: {{Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME}}.
  • Consider also adding {{subst:VFDNote|PAGENAME}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the article's principal contributor(s).

Note: Suggestions for requesting deletion of multiple pages, non-article pages, and repeat nominations may be found at VFD tips.

Voting on deletions

Once listed, the entire Wikiquote community is invited to vote on whether to keep or delete each page, or take some other action on it. Many candidate articles will have specific dates by which to vote; if none is given, you can assume at least seven days after the article is listed before the votes are tallied.

To vote, jump or scroll down to the entry you wish to vote on, click its "edit" link, and add your vote to the end of the list, like one of these:

  • Keep. ~~~~
  • Delete. ~~~~
  • (other actions; explain) ~~~~
  • Comment (not including action) ~~~~

Possible other actions include Merge, Rename, Redirect, Move to (sister project). Please be clear and concise when describing your action.

The four tildes (~~~~) will automatically add your user ID and a timestamp to your vote. This is necessary to ensure each Wikiquotian gets only a single vote. You can add some comments to your vote (before the tildes) to explain your reasons, but it is not required. However, it may help others to decide which way to vote.

Please do not add a vote after the closing date and time; any late vote may be struck out and ignored by the closing admin.

NOTE: Although we use the term "vote", VfD is not specifically a democratic process, as we have no way of verifying "one person, one vote". It is designed to "take the temperature" of the community on a subject. Sysops have the responsibility of judging the results based on a variety of factors, including (besides the votes) policies, practices, precedents, arguments, compromises between conflicting positions, and seriousness of the participants.

Closing votes and deleting articles

Sysops have the responsibility to review the list and determine what articles have achieved a consensus, whether it is for deletion, preservation, or some other action. All candidate articles should be listed here at least seven days before the votes are tallied. Many VfD entries will have "Vote closes" notices to indicate when the votes will be tallied.

  • The sysop tallying the vote should add a "vote closed" header with the result of the vote, and sign it.
  • If consensus is for deletion, the sysop should follow the deletion process to delete the article.
  • If it is to keep, or if there is no consensus for action, the sysop should remove the {{vfd-new}} tag from the article and post a notice on the article's talk page about the completed VfD, including a link to the VfD discussion on that article. The {{vfd-kept-new}} template can be used for a standard notice.
  • There may also be a vote to move (rename) or otherwise change the article. The sysop's actions will depend on the specific situation in these cases. In those cases, a notice should also be posted on the talk page documenting the decision.

To avoid conflict of interest, a sysop should never close a VfD that he or she started. However, a sysop may close a VfD in which he or she has voted.

After a reasonable time, a sysop will then move the entire entry into the appropriate month page of the VfD log. (Some old discussions are available only in the old Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive.)

Note: In the interest of cross-wiki cooperation, please check Wikipedia to make sure their articles don't link back to an article that has just been deleted. Also de-link any other language edition articles (though if you find that daunting, EVula is more than happy to do so).

Reviewing closed votes

All closed votes will be archived indefinitely in per-month pages at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Log. (A few are still found only in the old Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive.) See that page for details.

Deletion candidates

Surbhi Jyoti

PR at work — Kulfikaju (talk · contributions)

  • Vote closes: 14:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Peppa Pig

Contested PROD - for being a poorly translated and non-memorable set of quotes. In its current form, this is a poor page and not worthy of remaining. — UDScott (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 14:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ UDScott (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Although my inclination is to delete, this does appear to be Peppa Pig a notable series (with a better developed page on Polish Wikiquote). There is probably potential for this to be improved within the period of this discussion. BD2412 T 16:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
    • X mark.svgN Not Done. --Jume Heart (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC) Editor's only edits relate to to this VfD. BD2412 T 21:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete – Nothing of any Quotability here. Much of it is so incoherent that it is evidently mistranscribed. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. --77.37.134.66 11:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Jerry Lewis

Contested PROD for not having any sources for the quotes. The problem remains. (And note that the creator of this page has a long history of creating pages like this without any sources, apparently depending on someone else to do the work once the page gets nominated for deletion) — UDScott (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 15:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless properly sourced quotes are provided. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, unless sources or sourced quotes are added before the end of this discussion. BD2412 T 16:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep: I sourced 2 quotes. CensoredScribe (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Feminist films

Applying political ideological labels to works doesn't work even unless expressly stated by the author in the work its self and not just a commentary; which rarely happens because of how blunt it is and how divisive politics are generally avoided in film to maximize the size of the audience through unoffensiveness (in theory). Political ideologies are extremely debatable as labels for people, much less works; it's not like with political parties or organized religions where membership is officially recognized by some governing body. — CensoredScribe (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 16:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete—Normally, I would vote keep for this and similar categories.  But since Category:Libertarian films was not deemed suitable by the community, I see no reason why this category would be deemed acceptable, either.  Maybe someday, in future years, opinions will sway, and categories such as these will no longer be viewed as unsuitable.  But, until then, it only makes sense that we be consistent.  allixpeeke (talk) 19:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Michael Keaton

Contested PROD for not having any sourced quotes. The problem remains. — UDScott (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 17:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless properly sourced quotes are provided. ~ UDScott (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
    • Keep, now that sourced quotes have been added. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep and improve. It should not be at all difficult to find quotes for this page. BD2412 T 14:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
    • Comment: I agree that it shouldn't be too tough to find some quotes for this obviously notable person. My nomination was borne out of frustration with the author of this page, who has continually created pages for living people with absolutely no sourced quotes (then every time removes the PROD tag without fixing the issue). This user also disrupts the VFD process (and is currently blocked for doing so). Since someone has now sourced some quotes, this page will likely remain (rightly so), but I hate for someone to have to always fix this problem. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Martín Palermo

Not notable enough for their own page; unless every professional athlete is notable because they are on television; if I created a page like this fora scientist talking of ground breaking research with massive ethical implications it would have lasted 5 minutes unless they had a wikipedia page. There isn't even a page for American football here; or what about Mark McwGire or Moe Berg; both must be more important/quotable than Tom Baldwin Medical Research Humans Animals Regulation CensoredScribe (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Comment: The quote on the page is not very memorable - and I wouldn't object to deleting the page for that, but I disagree with the premise of this nomination. I do believe this person is notable enough for a page, provided there were properly sourced memorable or pithy quotes provided. ~ UDScott (talk) 23:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Family Feud

Nothing here is memorable (not to mention not sourced to a specific episode or date aired). — UDScott (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 03:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless memorable, properly sourced quotes are added. ~ UDScott (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep, I think it should be keep. ~ BuddyBoy600 (talk) 08:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

The Price Is Right

Nothing here is memorable (not to mention not sourced to a specific episode or date aired). — UDScott (talk) 02:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 03:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless memorable, properly sourced quotes are provided. ~ UDScott (talk) 02:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep, They are memorable quotes to the show. ~ BuddyBoy600 (talk) 08:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Classic Concentration

Nothing here is memorable (not to mention not sourced to a specific episode or date aired). — UDScott (talk) 02:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 03:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless memorable, properly sourced quotes are added. ~ UDScott (talk) 02:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep, Yes, Those are memorable quotes to the show. ~ BuddyBoy600 (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Double Dare

Nothing here is memorable (not to mention not sourced to a specific episode or date aired). — UDScott (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Vote closes: 03:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless memorable, properly sourced quotes are added. ~ UDScott (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep, Yes, The quotes are memorable to the show. ~ BuddyBoy600 (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, really no point in keeping this page. ---Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)