User talk:Ilovemydoodle/Archives/Archive 1

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive
Archive
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

May 2022

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikiquote. When you add content to talk pages and Wikiquote pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikiquote:Vandalism in progress , (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

PAVLOV (talk) 09:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I usually do, I must’ve forgotten that time. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 16:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. PAVLOV (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you forgot again at User talk:MinervaMoment. Cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 17:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The page clearly has it. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you are right, when one scrolls to the bottom of the page it does show your signature, sorry. On another note I see you have been doing a lot of template work on WQ and I was wondering if you can help putting a collapse around unsigned new sections which are popping up at an alarming rate on WQ:AN, to avoid the cluttering of discussion there. Also, do you know how some other projects have unsigned sections automatically signed? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, done (forgot to say it earlier). – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 04:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before going further...

The following formatting seems to be something you are leaving me notes about:- 


: <p>'''Text line'''</p>
:<p> '''Text line'''</p>

The rendered output is identical.

Text line

Text line

So which is the correct one to use please? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first one. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your care

Hi, @Ilovemydoodle, I'm really stressed out and decide to leave Wikimedia projects. So the deletion of the userpage is a self-request deletion. Thank you a lot for your care, take care my friend, and happy editing. --PAVLOV (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Reagan/Donald Trump

Hi Ilovemydoodle/Archives/Archive 1, Nice find at Ronald Reagan. Cheers, —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ottawahitech (talk • contribs) 13:38, 12 May 2022‎ (UTC)

Templates

Hi, thanks for your work - and not to discourage any template creation, but I would caution you to be sure there is not already a template that exists that covers the same topic as one you create. For example, the template Template:Uw-tilde that you created seems very similar to the Template:Sign, Template:Sign1, and Template:Sign2 templates. If you wish to edit existing templates because you have better words to describe the issue or a better way to display the message, this would be better to do than to simply add another similar template that in the end is likely redundant. This is just one example I noted - not sure if there are others you've created that are similar to other already existing ones. Thanks. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer my revision, so I made Sign redirect to mine. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ilovemydoodle, The template {{Similar links}} currently displays a link to a sister project whether it contains information or not. Is there a way to improve it so that only links that exist show up? Am I making sense? Ottawahitech (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know how to fix it, but it’s protected. – Ilovemydoodle (talk | e-mail) 02:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

welcome back

Hello, I'm glad to see you back, wish you well. --PAVLOV (talk) 13:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Take care when you are adding categories that you don't overdo it. Often, there are specific categories that are already there and adding a general category can be redundant. An example is to add the category of 'Poets' to a page that already has the category of 'English poets' (which is already a subcategory of 'Poets'). Both are not needed and the more specific category is preferred. Thanks. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't realize that, new to categories. – Ilovemydoodle (talk / e-mail) 14:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries (and thanks for working on them now) - just don't need to have multiple categories covering the same ground. Thanks. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Try to avoid adding redlinked categories also. Good to see you still working on this project, Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 16:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I try to. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 16:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New template

Your new template (Template:Uw-delete2) seems to have some overlap with the well-established and used "test" templates (especially the "test2a" template). If you wish to have different language in such warnings, rather than create new and possibly redundant templates, it seems like it would be better to suggest adjusting the ones that already exist. Make sense? ~ UDScott (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you saying, I don't understand. – Ilovemydoodle (talk / e-mail) 04:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What I am saying is that you continue to create what appear to be redundant and repetitive templates for topics for which we already have well established templates that have been in use for many years. If you don't like the language in a given template, it is better to discuss potential changes to it rather than just creating a new template that has similar functionality. We don't need so many new templates if there are already templates that serve the same purpose. ~ UDScott (talk) 13:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know all Wikiquote Templates, and unlike with Wikipedia, they often don't show up through search engines. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 13:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but if you are going to create new templates, I would argue that you should be checking to see if similar templates already exist. At a minimum, take a look at pages like Wikiquote:Template messages/User talk or Wikiquote:Template messages before you act. Now you've created Template:Uw-delete3, which again has similar function as Template:Test3. And don't just simply make the test templates redirects to your new ones - such changes should be discussed before any action is taken. Those templates have been in wide use for a long time. ~ UDScott (talk) 13:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Uw-delete3 is for deletion, Test3 is just a general warning, different. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 13:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The message from Uw-delete3 says: "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing." The message from test3 says: "Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, add nonsense pages, or pages for nonnotable subjects, you may be blocked from editing Wikiquote." I see a lot of similarity between the two and I would rather tweak the language of the test3 template to cover more ground than to bring in a new template where it will be confusing as to which to use in a given situation - and it is similar for Uw-delete2 vs. test2. (And one other note: when you bring over templates from Wikipedia, be sure to change to Wikiquote - this one still references WP). I'm not trying to squash your efforts, and your enthusiasm is admirable - I just want to streamline as much as possible - especially since we have so many templates that people don't even know about or use. Adding more just seems like it will make things worse. ~ UDScott (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, can you please quickly block User:Javaethanantdeath (GRP sock). – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 13:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi hope you are ok, saw some stuff got revdelled here. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 16:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for some old vandalism to be revdeled. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 16:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi no worries, glad things are ok. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 16:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

@Ferien: Could you give me any suggestions on how to improve my User Page? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 17:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ilovemydoodle, not really, my userpage here isn't that appealing. You might be able to get some inspiration from my simplewiki userpage but there may be a few templates that don't exist here that exist over there. --Ferien (talk) 20:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien: Your Userpage is my favorite Userpage I have seen on Wikiquote so far. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF) (talk / e-mail) 20:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, but i need your attention

there's someone on another wiki (can't say the name because of the abuse filter) that keeps vandalizing pages because they are mad that a sockmaster stole their username. is that guy actually you? AtomicMario (talk) 22:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ds
that guy on that wiki (not here on wikimedia, on the wiki i'm talking about) is just a banned editor and sockmaster who likes to impersonate wikimedia admins. just ignore him and move on. AtomicMario (talk) 22:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
also i keep triggering the abuse filter everytime i try to tell something useful, so talk me on the forums (the link is on the sitenotice). AtomicMario (talk) 22:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AtomicMario:
Template:Ds
  • RealIlovemydoodle
  • IlovemydoodleREAL
  • WatchNotJustBikes
– Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 23:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, but the fact that all of these new accounts act like you suggests that you are sockpuppeting. ADMIT IT. also, the guy that stole your name is nothing more than a typical sockpuppeter. the only thing we do is "revert, ban, ignore" just like here. ignore him and move on with your life. AtomicMario (talk) 23:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, admitted, ignoring GRP. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 23:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ilovemydoodle, it's better to just not engage with them and focus on contributing to WMF wikis instead. I would absolutely not make anymore accounts or edit at all there, just ignore them. I understand you're unhappy about the userpage there but it's a trolling site, they won't co-operate. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 15:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 20:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, unfortunately a lot of the internet is like that. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 20:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rubbish computer: Also, who is AtomicMario? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 00:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No idea. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

I noticed you created User:PAVLOV and User:Mad Pierrot. Creating a user page should be left up to the user, generally speaking. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 16:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create my userpage, dear Ilovemydoodles, I leave it empty on purpose. PAVLOV (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I was categorizing Users with Hotcat. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 20:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would just ask before editing userpages in future. I probably would have done the same in my much earlier days of editing. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 20:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block message

Hi. Why are you marking IP-addresses as blocked indefinitely when they are not blocked? The user of a IP-address is changing over time and is normally not blocked indefinitely. You are feeding the trolls by drawing attention to them. Just ignore them. -- Tegel (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accident, I was marking indefinitely blocked accounts and mistook one non-block IP for one. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But you are still marking IP-addresses as blocked indefinitely. Is that according to a local policy? -- Tegel (talk) 22:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know if there is a policy for that or not, just making easier for editor’s to find out which users are LTAs. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But you are still marking an IP-address as an LTA. That means that the user that gets the same IP-address next time will be marked as an LTA. You are drawing attention to the vandal and that is exactly what they want. Just ignore them. -- Tegel (talk) 22:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the Template, though. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Account

Hi. You mentioned on a different talk page that you couldn't edit Wikipedia in English because your account was blocked. What is the name of the account that is blocked on en.wiki? -- Tegel (talk) 22:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tegel: w:Special:contribs/2603:7080:DA3C:7A33::/64. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so it wasn't an account but an IP-range. Was it you that got the IP-range blocked? -- Tegel (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: I originally made a few minor mistakes, but nothing really to get blocked for, but eventually I found a page called "Wikipedia:Village dump" (I don't remember how I found the page), the page was just a redirect to the Village Pump, but after checking the revision history, I noticed it used be a page that was actually used, I thought this was a cool idea, so I recreated it, but as it turns out this was commonly done by a group of vandals, the Admin must've thought I was one of them. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 22:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anon IP addresses are NOT usually blocked indefinitely

I just checked a couple of the anon IP pages which you had been tagging as indefinitely blocked, but that is NOT the case. It is very rare, and not general policy for IPs to be indefinitely blocked, merely because they have been used by twerps. Sometimes long-term blocks are appropriate, as seem to be the case here — but the blocks I checked were for a few months, and not permanent ones. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalki: Accidental, feel free to remove them if there inaccurate. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 23:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

reply

here's my reply. in case you're asking why i created it as a subpage, it's because it kept triggering the abuse filter. AtomicMario (talk) 13:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AtomicMario: Ok, thanks, also why am I blocked? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 13:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GRP

A page that you have been involved in editing, Template:GRP, has been listed for deletion. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the nomination for deletion (see also what Wikiquote is and is not). If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:GRP. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Thank you. Ferien (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PGRP

A page that you have been involved in editing, Template:PGRP, has been listed for deletion. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the nomination for deletion (see also what Wikiquote is and is not). If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:PGRP. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Thank you. Ferien (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging socks

Please do not tag socks. Socks rarely need to be tagged, and a lot of the ones you are tagging are not tagged per w:WP:DENY. --Ferien (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, understood, but please keep Template:BlockedLTA and Template:PotentialLTA as they are sometimes needed. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 12:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, please stop tagging socks. GRP ones in particular are a waste of time, as there are so many of them and he has been WMF-banned for many years, it's best to w:WP:DENY. --Ferien (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: wiki-sisters

The quotes are all cited by links to their sources directly beneath them or in footnotes. I have not “made up” any of them. Some of the quotes are not immediately accessible because they link to a game but since it’s open-source you can presumably find them in the files. Please to not make blatantly false deletion requests Dronebogus (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, mistake, I messed up and didn't see the inline sources, only references. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 12:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous misinformation

Explain exactly how that is. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:E063:4F0A:A2FD:6FA1 19:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:E063:4F0A:A2FD:6FA1: The information leads people to believe the covid vaccine is dangerous, which might lead to them not getting it. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 19:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There have been side effects to getting it, and the injections have not prevented people from getting the virus or becoming sick. Unfortunately, it has not proven to be safe and effective. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 02:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Source? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 02:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sources, as in the quotes you have deleted? 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 02:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Also why did remove the thing about Holocaust denial and denying women to vote. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 02:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which quotes are you talking about? 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 02:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Not quotes, the lead section on Nick Fuentes. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 02:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Better would be for that to be listed in a "Quotes about Fuentes" section so people can make their own minds up. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 02:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Why? It's objectively true. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, he is not far-right. Christian nationalist? Sure. Reactionary? Okay. But not far-right. And not a white nationalist either. If the ADL say he is one thing or another, that could be put in a quotes section about him, but not the lead. Doesn't matter that his youtube channel was suspended. As far as anti-semitic, holocaust denial or women's right to vote opposition, quotes from him directly would be better than the words of the ADL. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Could you please give a reliable source on this? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My word of honor 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Sorry but even if you were the most reliable person in the world this still wouldn't be a reliable source, I mean can you give me a source that meets Wikipedia:Reliable sources. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Claiming something is "dangerous misinformation" is not a warrant to remove it, just because you choose to believe so - without any valid sources. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: [1]. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My sources say otherwise, and are better. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Please tell me your sources then. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"First and foremost I am a Christian." Why do you remove this quote? 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Accident, while removing the other things you did, will go fix now. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Fuentes

Stop deleting those quotes by Fuentes. You can check for youself per the link, he said what is written. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 02:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: I am not undoing because I don’t think he said them, I'm undoing because they're potentially dangerous. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 02:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The quotes are not dangerous. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 02:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Source? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 02:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The quotes themselves? 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: That they are not dangerous. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But they are not dangerous. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C 03:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:34EA:56DB:1942:B27C: Source? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this ADL source that claims he is a white supremacist and racist? 121.221.243.153 03:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@121.221.243.153: And why are you using an open proxy? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may find this information interesting

Australia has had more COVID death since the COVID vaccine was introduced in Feb 2021 and substantially more excess death from other causes. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:8860:233D:86EA:8A60 08:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

here is another one - Do the COVID-19 injectables (aka "vaccines") reduce COVID-19 hospitalisations?. 2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:8860:233D:86EA:8A60 08:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:8003:DDAA:5A00:8860:233D:86EA:8A60: That site appears to be some sort of blog, which is not considered a reliable source. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 20:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Worldwide scientific consensus crushes the opinions of a few angry anti-vaxxers the way Godzilla crushes a grape. We don't need to give them airtime. Antandrus (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Per my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notice

Strictly speaking, I don't think we have any rule against your edit notice, but I would at least encourage you to make it a little more obvious that it's not a genuine block and maybe take up a little less space. It's fine to have some fun, of course, but I don't want anyone actually put off from editing or too confused. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 03:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-sisters

@Dronebogus: Just so you know, Wiki-sisters has been listed for deletion. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 13:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-sisters

@Dronebogus: Can you please explain what you are doing? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 14:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think being outside Wikimedia sites is a legitimate reason to remove content. Dronebogus (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: Yes but, it's not real content. I could make my own site where I could put whatever I want, does my content have to be included then? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 14:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, it relates to the project. I think it’s been established that notability isn’t required for non-articles. Dronebogus (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: I’m pretty sure that goes against WP:RELIABILITY. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 14:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How is fiction governed by reliability? Dronebogus (talk) 14:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: Is this a source I can add to the page? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 14:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it’s less a problem of where it’s from and more what it is because that’s not very quotable. There are notable works that are not quote-worthy either. Dronebogus (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Biden

Why are you once again just disregarding the discussion we had? You are again introducing alternate formatting to this page based on your own personal preferences. I also question the removal of a quote that for some reason you feel is a "non-quote". I don't understand why you are continuing this behavior. Is it your intent to just wait some period of time after an unresolved conversation and then just do what you wish? This is what appears to have happened here. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I forgot, undoing. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 15:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@UDScott: Edit: I created an RfC, here. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 15:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editnotice

@UDScott: What do you think of my Editnotice? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 17:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not UDScott, but I personally find it to be disruptive. Please can you change it? --Ferien (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also don't like the dark green background, it makes things more difficult to read. --Ferien (talk) 12:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien:
1) The background isn’t dark green.
2) I don't want to remove it, but I could make it less disruptive, do have any suggestions?
– Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 19:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The background was dark green for me, then it was dark blue and now it is a lime/light green colour. It keeps changing. It looks like it's coming from User:Ilovemydoodle/c, where the colour is random. An edit notice saying "You are blocked" is going to confuse people and make it harder for people to contact you. Even the thought of being blocked is just going to distract people, and particularly distract people from the main aim of your talk page which is to contact you. --Ferien (talk) 19:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien: Could you answer my request on RfA? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 19:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, please remove your blatantly misleading editnotice. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: I can’t, it was added by an Interface Administrator. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 09:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Right now you can edit User:Ilovemydoodle/FakeBlockMessage. However, I suggest that @Koavf be more careful with this in the future. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: I am fine with it the way it is, I can move the joke alert Template up, though. As for Koavf, he seemed fine with it. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 09:45, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you see the discussion, I discouraged this, but it's allowed and if the community thinks it's a bad idea, it can be discussed and amended/deleted. I recommended against it, but I'm not going to stop someone from having an editnotic on his user/talk if he wants unless it actually contradicts a rule. If I'm missing something, let me know. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: I add a disclaimer at the top. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 19:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I saw and I think it's better for sure. I still don't think it's a good idea, but it's up to you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: Thank you. I'm going to keep it. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 19:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Hello. Thank you very much for your help. Could you also help me with the copyright panel in "José Baroja". I do not know how to do it. I already added the translations of the quotes. Thank you very much. Lectorlatinoamericano (talk) 17:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lectorlatinoamericano: Sorry, but I am not sure what you mean by the "copyright panel", could you please clarify? Thanks! – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 19:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP user pages

Hi. Is it per policy on this wiki that IP-addresses shall have a user page? You are still tagging IP-addresses as vandals. IP-addresses that can have a new user behind it a number of times every day. -- Tegel (talk) 20:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tegel: Only because an LTA was putting content there. Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 20:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So because an LTA was using a specific IP-address you are marking all user in the future as vandals that happen to get that IP-address? -- Tegel (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: No, a different LTA gave an LTA a welcome message, so I replaced it with what should be there. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 20:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A user behind a specific IP-address is not fixed. Don't assume that it is the same user behind all edits from a IP-address. -- Tegel (talk) 20:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 20:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Is it OK by the local community on this wiki to exclude users from the talk pages just because they don't use the default settings? -- Tegel (talk) 11:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tegel: Could you please clarify what you mean? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 11:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
With the settings that you apply to the talk page you are preventing uses to edit the talk page if they have change the settings from the default settings. Is that OK according to the local community? -- Tegel (talk) 11:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: I still don’t understand, what do you mean by "settings"? – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 11:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In the settings to the account you can select between different "skins" to get a different look. If someone has change to a different "skin", for instance "Monobook", the edit button at the top of the page is not possible to access anymore. This prevent me from edit the page if I don't remove the settings that you apply to the page. -- Tegel (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. Fixing it. – Ilovemydoodle (Not WMF, Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus, Not a paid editor of Shueisha) (talk / e-mail) 11:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Don't forget the color settings. Black text on a dark blue background that pops up now and then is not the best regarding visibility. -- Tegel (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Not to undermine all your work, but I am still a bit confused by the seemingly endless stream of templates you have created. I've completely lost track of them all - and for most of them, I have no idea what they are supposed to do. And as I have stated before, some of them appear to be redundant with existing templates. No offense, but I just don't see myself using any of them (especially if I already know and use other templates for similar reasons). Perhaps it might help if you created a list of them all on your user page with a quick description of what they are for? ~ UDScott (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on a lot of them, I will work on a list.(note: not all Templates in use are finished, in fact most of them aren't) - Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 12:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, can you give me an example of which ones you are confused about? – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 12:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The confusion stems from the fact that there seem to be hundreds of them you have added, with little to no explanation on their use. I don't have the time to parse through each one to figure out how it is used. I am only a reader of Wikipedia and am not really familiar with most of their templates, so if that is what you are doing (transferring their templates to here), the confusion will remain. I just don't see the need for this flood of new templates. Perhaps they all have some use, but it is overwhelming the number of new ones you have created. The set of templates we have had for a number of years seemed fine to me - if improvement was needed to them, I would have rather change them then just bring over a ton of new ones. And by the way, your talk page is nearly unreadable at times. The latest color it chose was a dark red with black type and I couldn't read your reply until I tried to edit it and got back to a white background. ~ UDScott (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@UDScott: I’ll add a purge button. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 12:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you get a chance Warren Buffet

Hi ilovemydoodle,

When you come back from your short wiki-break would you look at this: https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Warren_Buffett&diff=3126670&oldid=3082744 Is this a good quote source?

Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

I find it highly ironic that you railed against some of the new designs that are being offered when you continue to bombard this site with new templates that are not really needed either. Your argument that things were just fine as they were could be used against your additions too. I still don't understand why you continue to add new templates that are redundant with ones we already have here and have used for years. What is the great need that you are filling? I just don't see why we need all of these and I don't believe that most will be used. ~ UDScott (talk) 00:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@UDScott: A lot of them were accidental, and I will be going through them soon and listing them for deletion. Also a lot of the more useful ones actually didn’t have a pre-existing version – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet of Antandrus) (talk / e-mail) 00:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BlockedLTA

A page that you have been involved in editing, Template:BlockedLTA, has been listed for deletion. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the nomination for deletion (see also what Wikiquote is and is not). If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:BlockedLTA. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping all users

A page that you have been involved in editing, Template:Ping all users, has been listed for deletion. All contributions are appreciated, but it may not satisfy Wikiquote's criteria for inclusion, for the reasons given in the nomination for deletion (see also what Wikiquote is and is not). If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Template:Ping all users. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 12:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you have created a massive mess

with your talk page moves and I suggest you stop. There is no indication Ethan's account is compromised and I cannot for the life of me figure out why you moved an active, good faith editors talk page like you did. Praxidicae (talk) 03:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: OH NO! I messed up massively, GRP created an account with an almost identical username. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet) (talk / e-mail) 03:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it was barely identical, I suggest you leave the fixing to people who have an actual clue what they're doing as this is a massive waste of others time and a huge mess and further feeds into what GRP wants. Praxidicae (talk) 03:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry! – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet) (talk / e-mail) 03:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
riously, even after this conversation you're still being disruptive. Do not undo the deletion request on the talk page because your disruptive move means it has to be moved back and that cannot be done until the talk page you tagged as a compromised account is deleted.e Praxidicae (talk) 03:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet) (talk / e-mail) 03:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All fixed. (I think?) – Ilovemydoodle (Not a sockpuppet) (talk / e-mail) 03:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilovemydoodle/Archives/Archive_1&oldid=3189773"