Wikiquote:Vandalism in progress/Archive/10

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

New report 2021-01-10, 19:58

@UDScott:
@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:

Filing a false report and feeble excuses in an attempt to evade an inevitable block. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like he did a dumb joke but I don't think this is indicative of future vandalism. Seems fairly one-off. I say let sleeping dogs lie. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-01-27, 02:17

Attacking users, inserting COVID related vandalism. Dylsss (talk) 02:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Globally blocked. Dylsss (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-01-28, 17:47

They made a page called Our law is your law which just has a YouTube link and no quotes in general. I say let them off with a warning and if anything bad happens subsequently, you block 'em! 152.26.199.24 17:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just said welcome. I don't think more action is needed but that page was obviously inappropriate. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-01-29, 22:39

Trolling. See the IP's edits to random IPs' talk pages for details. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And a sockpuppet IP to boot, trying to poke fun at me. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-1, 22:09

For the love of DawgDeputy's favorite sisters, look at this garbage! 152.22.32.24 22:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done deleted. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For future reference, stop trolling. "For the love of DawgDeputy's favorite sisters"?! Do not ever do that! DawgDeputy (talk) 01:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-2, 19:03

Clear vandalism.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 19:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-4, 17:54

Put too many exclamation marks in quotes. One is enough. Check them all. 152.26.199.24 17:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-17, 23:07

@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:
@DannyS712:
@Tegel:
@Saroj Uprety:

In its feeble attempts to assist everyone here against vandalism, it only adds to the problem by redoing vandalism, re-adding quotes in direct violation of quote limits, making a mockery out of me, unruly calling akko a bot without any evidence, false (and somehow personal) threats against another vandal (even sending such threats to a vandal is vandalism), etc. It has learned nothing from its previous block. I request immediate action be taken against this IP before it strikes again. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: A sockpuppet IP is attempting to make true editors look foolish.
152.26.199.24 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)
These IPs need to be blocked indefinitely, and denied access to talk pages, lest any further damage be done. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-21, 04:16

Only vandalism. Mtarch11 (talk) 04:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-22, 17:20

Adding incorrect information to and vandalising Shrek. --Belwine (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked the IP. ~ UDScott (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-23, 15:14

See Toy Story. --Belwine (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-24, 02:21

Persistent vandalism. Hasley (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:
@DannyS712:
@Tegel:
@Saroj Uprety:

A long history of problematic edits and ignoring rules, and in trying to undo vandalism (or so he egregiously claims), he continuously adds to the problem, and mocks those who undo his edits. He constantly claims he would never add unnecessary emphasis to quotes again, but he constantly breaks that promise without any remorse (besides, he should never have vandalized to begin with). And fellow user Eaglestorm (a longtime model editor) will back me up on this one. I request this user be blocked for good and is denied access to talk pages. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-02-26, 17:11

Bad username. Please also delete the pages they made. Thanks. --Belwine (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now globally locked --Belwine (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-03-6, 21:17

Repeated vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a content dispute but not vandalism. It's valid to write "NOOOO!" versus "No!". This should be discussed on talk and only constitutes admin action to the extent that it's edit-warring. That said, if you're going to submit his actions as edit-warring, I would think twice if I were you because edit wars generally involve more than one editor... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-03-27, 23:41

Changing "monster" to "monkey" in articles such as Monsters, Inc., Monsters University, Sesame Street, etc. all without explanation to boot. Not only do I request that the user be blocked for a long period of time, but that the articles it vandalized be protected indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the anon IP for a month, at this point, but would block it longer if it resumes vandalism, and page protections could be for several months to a year, if vandalism to them resumes. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 01:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-04-11, 02:13

New report 2021-04-21, 20:10

I have just noticed that this crosswiki vandal has some edits at Wikiquote too like at Jack-Jack Attack, but I did not check them as I did not find there the source of the original text. --Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-04-24, 08:43

Crosswiki abuser of Harling Bassukarno. Previous accounts have been blocked on idwiki and other projects. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Has been globally locked --DannyS712 (talk) 08:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-04-25, 23:27

Blatantly and inexplicably spreading misinformation (example: Changing debut years to mislead readers). DawgDeputy (talk) 23:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:
The IP is at it again, spreading misinformation and refusing to explain its edits. Requesting long-term blocking and indefinite protection of all articles the IP vandalized. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked this particular IP for a month — as clearly an iteration of a vandal manifesting a pattern of long term abuse with multiple IPs. I have not at this point placed protections on all the various pages vandalized. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 01:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-04-28, 01:17

N Not Done /16 is a huge range to block (the largest allowed by the software configuration) and there isn't enough editing from the range to warrant such a block --DannyS712 (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-05-12, 19:43

Repeated vandalism. Arccosecant (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also TeguWally (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log). Arccosecant (talk) 20:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-05-17, 18:45

Sockpuppet of an LTA, creates nonsense talk pages, asks admins permission to vandalize (falsely claiming to "have fun"), and callously refers to administrator Hasley as a... I dare not say it. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-05-18, 20:15

@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:

Blatant misinformation on Shrek, Moon, and Toy Story, among other articles, and constantly tries to hide the fact that it is a vandal by trying to remove warnings. This IP needs to be blocked from editing (and denied talk page access) for a long period of time, and the pages it vandalized be protected for no less than that amount of time. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit I
Exhibit J

DawgDeputy (talk) 22:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-05-25, 02:30

@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:

Spreading blatant misinformation. See the user's list of contributions for details. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-06-15, 02:10

An incessant IP vandal who keeps adding to articles dialogue from characters that did not appear in that film, etc. This IP must be punished severely, and the pages protected indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-06-26, 05:54

creating the page that should not be here. 114.32.132.193 05:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-06-30, 20:40

Spam only accounts. Isabelle Belato (talk) 20:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-07-1, 11:19

Spambot. Same as yesterday. Lars2019 (talk) 12:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-07-12, 04:31

Only spam --Mtarch11 (talk) 02:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-07-26, 15:29

Long term abuse: GRP. See also Global IP block log and other wikis block log. cc @UDScott: --SCP-2000 (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for one month. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-07-27, 21:59

Spam. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 22:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-08-7, 19:42

See its long history of offensive edits/vandalism for details. This user must be blocked infinitely, and all pages it vandalized be protected indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And that all of its edits be struck as if they never existed. This one, for instance. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar given under false pretenses...

Christian M. (2016) recently received a "barnstar" from a vandal/troll who was clearly trying to spread its ridiculous agenda all over Wikiquote (illegally). And Christian M. foolishly believes it is legit. He is wrong. All of the following edits must be stricken, as if the "barnstar" never existed.

Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C

Please make things right and strike those edits before Christian M. attempts to restore it again. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-08-25, 22:33

Pesters administrators with false/outdated reports and egregiously requests deletion of one of its own creations (that it should never have created in the first place if it was that bad) for ridiculous reasons. Blocking this IP with five years of egregious editing indefinitely is appropriate. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-1, 23:10

Clear vandalism. MonstrumVenandiXXXII (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-3, 17:54

Another Projects sockpuppet. Someone report this user and deny his WMF privileges (with or without an IP) eternally. DawgDeputy (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Projects, but an impersonator of him. They're both WMF-banned so all their IPs and accounts can be globally locked on sight. I've reported both the IPs used to SRG. Ferien (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done. Now globally blocked by Tegel. Ferien (talk) 20:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-5, 02:21

False threats, false reports (which will inevitably be ignored by authorities), lack of remorse for its heinous actions, illegal/unauthorized creation of an unwanted user page (requesting infinite protection from creation by anyone but myself or admins), the whole nine yards. This IP's edits have to be struck from the record completely, as if the IP's edits never existed.

This is why only registered users should be allowed edit on Wikimedia. Vandals need to stop taking advantage of using IP addresses. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-7, 22:50

The Total Drama vandal wants the protection on the pages removed, but that just proves it wants to vandalize those pages again. It claims it will change, but that is what many vandals before it said, and none of them were given a chance. Another sockpuppet of Evilasio DP. Jr2. Request not only that this sock be blocked, but indefinite full protection of all Total Drama pages, as well as all of their talk pages. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-20, 15:59

Filing a false report against me, edit-warring, taunting vandals (especially by illegally signing administrators' names), administrators names and false legal threats, and in general, learning absolutely nothing from its previous blocks. Requesting infinite global blocking, and denial of talk page access. DawgDeputy (talk) 16:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for a month. --Aphaia (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I also recommend this IP be denied talk page access for that same time period. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DawgDeputy, I just thought I'd comment that infinite global blocks are never done. There is basically no cross-wikiness in this vandalism, it is basically only on Wikiquote, apart from a bit of vandalism a few months ago on Simple Wikipedia (see w:simple:User talk:152.22.84.23), so there is no need to globally block, let alone do that infinitely. --Ferien (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but this vandal continued after its previous blocks here on Wikiquote at least twice, and considering its problematic, inexcusable behavior all over Wikimedia, there is no doubt the vandal will continue when this block is over. I also request indefinite protection of Schoolhouse Rock! to prevent further edit wars from this IP. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user clearly wants no one to tell the difference between a radio affiliate and a television affiliate (among other sorts of affiliates). Deny this vandal talk page access during its block (and all of its future blocks). DawgDeputy (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And now the vandal is back in the form of this IP (and undoing its own edits with blatant lies to try and get away with vandalism):
2603:6080:a700:1c39:1069:93ff:27d9:b8dd (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Block this IP for a long period of time (and revoke talk page access) and protect all pages it vandalized indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-21, 23:07

Back to vandalize again. Considering this user's high level of vandalism, blocking it for any less than six months is not going to stop it. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-27, 02:23

Vandalism, and WMF banned user (w:WP:LTA/GRP). SHB2000 (talk) 02:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-09-27, 23:34

The Total Drama vandal is back to insert blatantly false information and refuse to provide official sources or admit it was wrong. This user must be blocked for a year, and all Total Drama pages must be protected indefinitely to prevent this from ever occurring again. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report - request for help cleaning up page move vandalism - 10/1/21

Hi there -- this sockpuppet is already globally blocked, but could someone with admin tools please clean up the page move vandalism on my user and user talk pages? User:Satan MansoN seems to be where my user page is after multiple moves; there are a couple redirects (at least one with a history) needing deletion. Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 21:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: please protect both my user and user talk pages from moves. Thanks in advance -- Antandrus (talk) 01:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems most Wikinger socks are now interested in page moves. SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your persistence, Antandrus. Your user page and talk are now restored. I hope it's fine to you. I protected both page from move: the user page is now only movable for admins, while the talk page is for auto-confirmed users. If you have a problem, please poke me. Cheers, --Aphaia (talk) 15:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Aphaia! Appreciate it. Antandrus (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-4, 19:12

Already blocked on Wikimedia Commons and has a whole history over on Wikipedia. Magitroopa (talk) 19:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-6, 23:03

Constantly adds its personal bias to articles, among other poor edits. Requesting a month's worth of block of this vandal and indefinite protection of all pages it ever touched, lest it attempt to hop to another IP. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-7, 02:45

Cross-wiki harassment, e.g. NSFW diff. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards have taken global action. --Ferien (talk) 14:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-14, 22:40

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:
@Hasley:
@Ferien:

Vandalizing the Toy Story articles and learning absolutely nothing from its previous block. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now the Shrek articles are victims of this vandal's treachery. Requesting blocking of no less than two months (though considering this vandal's level of vandalism, I would recommend at least a year). DawgDeputy (talk) 12:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-21, 01:37

Continued inexcusable ill behavior, especially on its own talk page, and false threats. Requesting no less than double its previous block, with permanent revocation of talk page access. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-22, 13:24

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:
@Hasley:
@Ferien:
Childish behavior, poorly-disguised intent to vandalize, and belittling other users. Recommending long-term blocking and indefinite protection of all Total Drama articles and talk pages. (but I still think WMF should be limited to only registered users) DawgDeputy (talk) 13:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DawgDeputy, not an admin, but a long-term block for an IP address who made one edit this morning is not a good idea in the slightest, unless the IP is a proxy or VPN. Ferien (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree - only if there is a persistent pattern of abuse by an IP address would such a block be considered. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a single edit by an Unwired mobile IP. Not entirely sure why this needs explained for the sixth time. Blocking a dynamic IP doesn't do anything. Let me say it again to be clear. Blocking a dynamic IP doesn't do anything. GMGtalk 16:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Based on another recent edit, this "dynamic IP" refuses to stop. I request indefinite (semi-)protection of every Total Drama article and talk page so this will never happen again. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-25, 17:27

@Kalki: @Ningauble: @GreenMeansGo: @Miszatomic: @Hasley: @Ferien:

Learned nothing from its previous block. Constantly adds excessive/vandalized quotes in violation of copyright restrictions. Requesting no less than two months of blocking of this problematic user, and more importantly, no less than a year's worth of (semi-)protection of all articles to which they submitted, lest they return and/or hop to another IP:

The Lion King II: Simba's Pride
Mulan (1998 film)
The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning

DawgDeputy (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the three above pages for a month - will revisit after that time has passed. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is still the matter of blocking the IP, which has been blocked before (three months ago). Apparently, after its favorite pages got protected against it, decided to take its actions elsewhere. DawgDeputy (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: It is clear this vandal refuses to stop. Long-term blocking is appropriate. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-10-29, 07:35

Spam on talk pages. Renvoy (talk) 08:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying us. The account is blocked for one day. --Aphaia (talk) 09:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-1, 04:12

Editing user discussion pages with images, curse words and even pornography. 2001:268:9013:8C75:9D01:FF2F:7D0C:ADC7 04:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-9, 17:40

Keeps creating nonsense pages and reverting the speedy deletion templates. FlyingAce (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-9, 17:41

Keeps creating nonsense pages and reverting the speedy deletion templates. Likely sock of Malcumm above. FlyingAce (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-12, 13:52

Persistent vandalizing The Wiggles (band). ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've already protected the The Wiggles (band) page - will keep an eye out for other potential targets of vandalism. ~ UDScott (talk) 14:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-13, 20:14

Poor editing, adding blank subsections without including meaningful and complete quotes, pestering administrators for help with vandalism, and false promises. Requesting significant blocking with revocation of talk page access (including its own), and indefinite (semi-)protection of all articles it vandalized. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How would you know that the IP is making false promises if they haven't edited since? Also note that this is not blatant vandalism, it may be disruptive editing, and they may be asking for help about how to add quotes etc? They look like a good-faith editor to me, but I don't really have too much of an effect on the final result. --Ferien (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Adding (blank) subsections and incomplete (and meaningless) quotes opens the door to even more incomplete (and meaningless) quotes, and I intend to keep that door locked and destroy the keys. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And I have been through IPs making false promises before. This IP may not be the same as before, but I refuse to take any chances. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You never know, they may have added the blank subsections to start adding quotes to them later. We can't assume every IP is the same and we can't block it just because we're assuming it will do something bad. Not every IP is a vandal. - Ferien (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the IP were not a vandal, the IP would have included real quotes (instead of useless, meaningless ones) with the subsections in the first place rather than open the door to other vandals or copyright violation (by that, I mean adding quotes to exceed the limit, depending on the length of the project). DawgDeputy (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On Wikipedia, yes, but here, non-problematic IPs have been declining, whereas problematic IPs have been rising. And speaking of problematics, we have a much worse IP user in the form of 73.190.188.98. See the report below. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless, hold off on this report for now. I have already reduced the number of quotes in Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (TV special) to meet the limit. But if this IP or any other user attempts to add any more quotes, they must be warned. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re: On Wikipedia, yes, but here, non-problematic IPs have been declining, whereas problematic IPs have been rising:
@DawgDeputy: My personal experience indicates a totally different situatIon from the one you describe, but IT IS anecdotal and not based on any type of unbiased statistics. Can you provide statistics to illustrate your views? thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on UDScott's talk page

This IP vandalism/harassment against this respected administrator (and all other administrators) has to come to a stop. Requesting indefinite semi-protection of his talk page for an indefinite period of time, and all harassment edits and edit summaries be stricken as if they never existed. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism is unkind and harassive to say the least, but indefinitely semi-protecting UDScott's user talk page would be completely ineffective for multiple reasons, like w:WP:DENY (making other innocent IPs suffer because of others' vandalism which gives that vandal recognition). They'd also just go onto another talk page. There's really no need to discuss it in detail (again, DENY) but I think that gives you somewhat of an idea into why this is not a good way to stop this vandalism. --Ferien (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is only one other way: Rally to only allow registered users on WMF, because IP addresses cause far more trouble than registered users. Once a registered user is blocked infinitely, blocking its future accounts is a snap. IP vandals, on the other hand, is another story. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, other administrators such as GreenMeansGo have had their talk pages semi-protected indefinitely, as well. Why should UDScott not receive the same treatment? And it would not hurt if you would do the same to your own talk page (I have seen the revision history on your talk page). Plus, my talk page is semi-protected, even though I am not an administrator.
Innocent IPs? Unfortunately, for the past few years, those sorts of IP addresses have been on the decline, whereas problematic IPs have been on the rise. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hasley's page has been indefinitely semi protected but he is not an admin. Admins' talk page should ideally not be protected at all because they are people who IPs may need to contact. On my home wiki (simplewiki), pages are rarely protected, let alone protected indefinitely and I personally wouldn't like my talk page protected. Even if a talk page was protected, what good will it actually do with this vandal? They will go to an archive, they will go to another page you edited, they will go to another wiki. Protection is truly useless in this situation. --Ferien (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The issue of IPs editing WMF projects is a whole other issue but creating an account does not take that much effort (you don't even need an email) so I think it would just increase vandalism from users, just like if you widen a road, more cars will drive on it. --Ferien (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Only allowing registered users to edit does not add to the vandalism. It actually curbs it further. It makes it that much easier to block them and disable more account creations. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Re:Only allowing registered users to edit does not add to the vandalism. It actually curbs it further
@DawgDeputy: Is the above your personal opinion or can you substantiate it with some proof/Statistics/whatever? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 13:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-13, 22:08

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:
@Ferien:

Second report since its previous block. Toy Story (etc.) pattern vandalism continues. See its contributions for details. Requesting a blocking of no less than six months, and semi-protection of all Pixar articles for no less than one year. Drastic action must be taken against this unrepentant vandal. DawgDeputy (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-17, 16:43

VOA. Thank you, —Hasley (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-20, 12:38

Vandalism in this range since May this year. Blocking the /64 is not a big deal per w:WP:/64 and the same range has been blocked on enwiki as you can see here, this is cross-wiki vandalism. I'd suggest a block of a month at least, as the vandalism is so long-term. --Ferien (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-21, 01:51

Persistent vandalism on SpongeBob SquarePants/Season 12. FlyingAce (talk) 02:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still ongoing... FlyingAce (talk) 06:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-22, 23:46

Creating spam pages, already blocked in Commons for the same reason. FlyingAce (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-24, 00:11

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:

Blatant trolling and general all-around vandalism. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-24, 00:16

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:

Vandalism-only account. Contributed absolutely nothing but zealousness, absolute lies, etc. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-11-26, 14:37

Inserting nothing but nonsense in the Toy Story articles. Requesting not only long-term blocking, but longer-term semi-protection of all Toy Story articles. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:

And the vandalism continues with the Curious George film. Not only requesting the vandal be blocked, but semi-protection of all articles the vandal even touched for no less than six months. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-3, 10:12

Content removal. Renvoy (talk) 10:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-4, 05:12

Adding nonsense. 魔琴 (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stale. The IP stopped editing. --魔琴 (talk) 09:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked 1 week by Aphaia. --魔琴 (talk) 12:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-7, 21:45

Personal attacks. Renvoy (talk) 22:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also

New report 2021-12-14, 22:14

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:

A long history of spreading lies on articles on which the IP edited. Requesting long-term blocking and longer-term (semi-)protection of all articles the IP vandalized so as not to leave the door open for any further vandalism if the IP vandal should ever do it again. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the vandalism continues. Requesting drastic action be taken against this high-level IP vandal before anymore damage is done. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-14, 22:50

Inserted fake information at Me at the zoo, such as a date 56 years in the future (in 2077), which I have already reverted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-15, 22:35

LTA. Spam Renvoy (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-17, 03:16

@Kalki:
@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Miszatomic:

The Total Drama vandal is at it again, refusing to admit the vandal was dead wrong. Illegally trying to turn a talk page into a dialogue page without first consulting higher-ups, for one. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-19, 18:24

Grossly insulting vandalism. Renvoy (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-20, 10:43

Vandalism. LTA. Renvoy (talk) 10:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-22, 23:21

Vandalism (Also on my user page). Nima Tayebian (talk) 23:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-24, 22:17

Content removal. LTA. Renvoy (talk) 22:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-27, 20:07

Vandalism : massiv content removal. RG067 (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2021-12-28, 02:00

Vandalism in Shark Tale, Thomas & the Magic Railroad, among other pages (undoing the vandal's own vandalism does not erase the vandalism from the record; only by not vandalizing to begin with can they not be a vandal). Requesting long-term blocking and longer-term semi-protection of all articles the vandal ever touched. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Vandalism_in_progress/Archive/10&oldid=3055452"