Wikiquote:Vandalism in progress/Archive/9

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please block page talk for 198.237.49.220[edit]

Special:Contributions/198.237.49.220 continue vandalism on this talk page. Tomybrz (talk) 17:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Several vandalistic edits on Disney films[edit]

For example, Special:Contributions/96.4.107.9 vandalizes numerous Disney films, particularly Pixar films, such as adding irrelevant cast members, non-existent lines, actions that include no dialogue, incomplete quotes, etc. I request all films it vandalized be protected and the IP be blocked for a long period of time. Plus, Toy Story 3 had another vandal with the same MO. Same request of action to be taken against this IP. WikiLubber (talk) 20:36, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done, vandal blocked Miszatomic (talk) 21:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One week while others pages are left unprotected is not going to stop this vandal. WikiLubber (talk) 23:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I protected a few of the pages indicated for 6 months, because they clearly had recently been vandalized, but not clearly by that IP. I did not actually encounter any edits which I could clearly discern as vandalism from the IP 96.4.107.9 in my scanning of some of the most recent edits. I don’t have much more time to spend here right now, so I was noting this when the above block occurred. I was going to leave other pages as they are, and this IP unblocked, but IF there are actually very clear cases of vandalism, and not merely differences in editorial preferences, I can let the block stand, otherwise, I actually do not yet see any clear reason to block this IP. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 22:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Adding the names of non-existent characters and/or characters from non-Disney/Pixar-related projects and changing lines to include these nonsensical names is clearly vandalism. WikiLubber (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And not to mention, in Rugrats, it inexplicably changed Tommy's name to "Jim", a character who never existed in that series. I request that its blocked be expanded from one week to no less than one year. WikiLubber (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If these reports are indeed the case, and this is deliberate vandalism, a 6 months-long block of this IP might be appropriate, but many of the edits of this IP which I scanned were not clearly vandalism, and some seemed to be reverting less subtle vandalism. I am not well-acquainted with many of the intricacies of most of these films, and some hardly at all, and thus cannot presume that such changes are vandalism without much greater familiarity with the films than I currently have, which I am not likely to acquire any time soon, if ever. The week long block currently in place can suffice for now. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 23:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The IPs non-vandalism edits are meaningless, because that edit in Rugrats, among the other edits I mentioned, was blatant vandalism without explanation, and therefore, calls for long-term blocking. And while we are on the subject, the same anonymous IP vandal who has been vandalizing the Toy Story films with nonsense quotes is taking its actions out on the Shrek franchise. I request this vandal be blocked for at least a year (because that was blatant vandalism with no remorse, which calls for a blocking of no less than a year), and more importantly, that all Shrek and Toy Story-related pages and our talk pages (because I know they will rub their vandalism in our faces, claiming their actions were "funny") be protected for no less than a year. WikiLubber (talk) 00:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done, pages protected.Miszatomic (talk) 08:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not just the film, but Rugrats the TV series itself, too. And the same goes for the Toy Story films (all three of them (soon to be four)). And two weeks will not do any good. I recommend no less than a year. WikiLubber (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

More vandals about...[edit]

Aside from those/it who keep trolling admins (someone call the right people so they/it will stop for good), many with biased edits in Finding Nemo, one with unnecessary "family" subsections in Lethal Weapon 4 (among other projects), etc. I request those pages be protected indefinitely, and all vandals involved blocked. WikiLubber (talk) 01:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please block ip user Special:Contributions/86.179.157.80[edit]

Thanks. --Catherine Laurence (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please block Special:Contribs/71.226.134.132[edit]

Absurd and persistent vandalism. Praxidicae (talk) 13:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battleforterra[edit]

Battleforterra (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) I've blocked it for a day as no admins were around - you might wish to extend the block. Please also delete the nonsense pages. Trijnstel (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please block 198.255.142.84 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)[edit]

User is currently engaging in disruptive editing. Aspening (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+1 and it lasts since 40 minutes. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)198.255.142.84 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)[reply]

Y Done Globally blocked for 3 month ([1]) —Eihel (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

73.37.237.49‎ (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log) who refuses to repent[edit]

73.37.237.49‎ constantly adds incomplete, over-emphasized, and general all-around vandalism quotes (as well as empty subsections), and constantly goes over the quote limitation on numerous pages. WikiLubber (talk) 21:11, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

64.228.80.38 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)[edit]

Please, block him and 71.226.134.132 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log), and configure block for 86.179.176.75. Hasley (talk) 17:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done for all three. ~ UDScott (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awariswhatweneednow (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)[edit]

Please review the edits of Awariswhatweneednow to revert/delete the remaining vandalism. No admin was around so I had to block it to stop it. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done, with a mass deletion of pages added. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 12:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

81.132.230.251 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)[edit]

Spreading insults and vandalizing. Similar behaviour as the account in the immediate section above. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done, with a mass deletion of pages added. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 12:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandals 159.146.18.238, 159.146.14.176, 159.146.45.95, 159.146.14.93, 159.146.18.66, 159.146.10.5, 159.146.14.50, 159.146.14.219, 159.146.18.186, 159.146.18.7, 159.146.18.61, 159.146.14.127, 159.146.18.211, 159.146.18.28, 159.146.14.12, 159.146.10.54, 159.146.14.70, 159.146.10.33, 159.146.10.99, 159.146.14.239, 159.146.10.112, 159.146.14.61, 159.146.10.38, 159.146.40.209, 159.146.10.37, 159.146.14.5, 159.146.10.210, 159.146.10.237[edit]

There are a group of IPs that look the same and also replace their own talk pages with nonsense and the same contents; definitely needs to be blocked. ——Blessings, Josephina (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like User:Ningauble threw down a /17 block, and someone else followed up with a /18 globally. GMGtalk 10:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The local range was already blocked locally by GMG on 9/23, more than a week before this supernumerary VIP request. On 10/5 I just renewed the duration and added "cannot edit own talk page" to the block. ~ Ningauble (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stalker[edit]

83.31.25.246 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)

IP belongs to a blocked account (by me). My guess would be he'll be back. Could my talk page please semi protected for a short period? He'll probably moves to the next wiki, but worth a shot. Thanks a bunch! --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 10:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hedwig in Washington: Y Done Blocked. Scrubbed. Protected. GMGtalk 10:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks mate! --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another IP vandal[edit]

135.180.76.76 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)

This IP has made blatant vandalism on Shining Time Station and tried creating separate articles for certain episodes, but that is not allowed here. I request that vandal be blocked for no less than a year, and the articles it vandalized be protected against all IPs for the same time period. WikiLubber (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLumber (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)[edit]

This vandal not only accuses the Shining Time Station vandal of being autistic without proper irrefutable authentication, but it also tries to impersonate me. I request this vandal be blocked infinitely and that its talk page editing privileges be revoked. WikiLubber (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


27-Dec-2019[edit]

This user just removed some quotes from Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse). AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11-Jan-2020[edit]

SchniggendiIIer (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

Long-term abuser, not a GS wiki so no help available unless a steward comes on. ~riley (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18-Jan-2020[edit]

I will never vote for Bernie Sanders under any circumstances (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) Crosswiki vandalism, local vandalism, no available steward for lock. Deletion required, see contribs. ~riley (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now locked. ~riley (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocritical Toy Story IP vandal...[edit]

207.225.26.200 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) It accuses me of ruining what it thought was updating the Toy Story page, which had been protected for a year before for good reason. But all of its edits were nothing but blatant vandalism and violation of copyright. I request this user be blocked for no less than a year and all articles it vandalized, including all Toy Story articles, be protected for no less than the same period of time. DawgDeputy (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked. jni (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The original Toy Story vandal...[edit]

2604:6000:E2C6:F000:BD4E:6070:E6EB:89C1 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

It is taking its vandalism out on the Thomas & Friends franchise. I request this vandal be range-blocked, and all Thomas & Friends pages be protected indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And its vandalism continues. I renew my request for drastic action to be taken. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whino07[edit]

Whino07 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) Unexplained content removal vandalism. ~riley (talk) 06:50, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Blocked. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inthenameofthelaw[edit]

Inthenameofthelaw (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) Vandalism. ~riley (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandalism[edit]

2605:E000:D409:3F00:4DD2:C38:32CD:46C5 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) IP vandalism. ~riley (talk) 08:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocritical vandal...[edit]

68.62.189.222 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

It has been making constant vandalism edits for the past four months and tries to take all the credit of undoing it for itself when it should not have been vandalizing in the first place. This LTA IP must be blocked for a long period of time. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

65.205.213.50[edit]

65.205.213.50 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

While its claims of vandalism were in the right (sort of), its false accusation of the vandal being on "spectrum" was even worse. I request this IP be blocked indefinitely for bullying. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

76.218.213.253 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

Now it continues to belittle users by using another IP address. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Loud 70[edit]

We have another persistent and unrepentant vandal on our hands, with sockpuppets to boot.

Mario Loud 70 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
86.190.1.253 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
86.189.228.28 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Spongebob Loud 1999 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

I request serious action be taken against this vandal, and that all pages it vandalized receive indefinite protection. DawgDeputy (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attention is required, as this vandal clearly refuses to comply with the messages we sent to its talk page. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another IP vandal on hand[edit]

As Mario Loud 70 continues to vandalize, another vandal is back in the form of this IP:

162.225.244.194 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) I request this vandal be blocked for no less than two years (since it learned nothing from the trouble it got into previously), and all pages it vandalized be protected for no less than that same period of time. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2001:8003:4085:8100:559F:59D0:347F:2FAA[edit]

See Special:Contributions/2001:8003:4085:8100:559F:59D0:347F:2FAA --DannyS712 (talk) 03:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive IPs[edit]

2600:1700:EA50:7FD0:1411:E19F:FB57:E35‎ (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) 2600:1700:ea50:7fd0:70a3:f6ef:b6a:1192 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) 2600:1700:EA50:7FD0:6D1B:82A5:4E15:932D (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) 2600:1700:ea50:7fd0:dc53:202b:2b99:20ce (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) 2600:1700:ea50:7fd0:600b:ecb1:b9eb:a4f8 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) They constantly refuse to abide by the rules, and the edit summary shown here is among proof. I request indefinite protection of all articles it vandalized. DawgDeputy (talk) 04:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive and impersonating IP[edit]

2606:A000:FC11:7400:3C16:C86B:3CAF:2 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

This IP sent messages to talk pages by signing Ningauble's and my usernames instead of using its own. Clearly a trolling impostor who clearly wants revenge against those who fight vandalism. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

86.178.37.61[edit]

86.178.37.61 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) See Special:Contributions/86.178.37.61 --Samuele2002 (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report[edit]

Excessive vandalism. Esteban16 (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Globally blocked. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block request 2001:8003:59DB:4100:348E:D0C4:E759:8AD0[edit]

Long-term abuse and sharing not eligible reasons to blame an another for sockpuppet abuse. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 09:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a long term abuser". --2001:8003:59DB:4100:348E:D0C4:E759:8AD0 09:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My reasons for being suspicous of gebruiker are listed at Wikiquote:Administrators' noticeboard. --2001:8003:59DB:4100:348E:D0C4:E759:8AD0 09:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Akhiljaxxn political censorship of quotes about Congress politicians[edit]

He has refused to discuss his removals on the talkpage despite being asked to do so.

These are the latest quotes he deleted:

  • People of India have seen obstacles of past 55 years and they have seen optimism of our 55 months. They have seen 55 years of Family First and 55 months of India First. ... We stand for democracy, they stand for dynasty, we stand for India First, they stand for Family First.
  • This is why it has been so astonishingly easy for the Gandhi dynasty to turn India’s oldest political party into a family firm. And once dynastic succession became acceptable at the highest levels of political power, it became impossible to prevent dynastic democracy spreading like a slow poison into the very soul of India. ... India’s ‘tryst with destiny’ could more appropriately have been called India’s tryst with dynasty.
    • Singh, Tavleen (2016). India's broken tryst. Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India : HarperCollins Publishers India, 2016.
  • Dynasty, a political tool in the hands of the ruling class, has become the catalyst for a new colonization of a country whose soul has already been deeply scarred by centuries of it.
    • Singh, Tavleen (2017). Durbar.

These quotes were deleted from the article Indian National Congress, here and here and later from the article on the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty[8] [9].

დამოკიდებულება (talk) 16:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akhiljaxxn continues edit-warring here and refuses to use the talkpage at Talk:Nehru–Gandhi family Talk:Indian National Congress Talk:Sonia Gandhi and Talk:Arnab Goswami --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 16:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The user Akhiljaxxn has also made personal attacks, calling other editors incompetent and hateful. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 17:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • To the AdminsThis user has been adding lots of statements as quotes to his political opponent's pages like you can see here and here. he is using wiki quotes as a tool to spread the message of RSS, an Indian right-wing, Hindu nationalist, paramilitary volunteer organisation. The user is also using this site to promote his hatred against other religions as well 1, 2, 3, 5. As an admin of Malayalam Wikipedia i"m well aware of these peoples editing behaviors. There are lots of Wikipedians including admins are attacked by their 1, 2, 3, 4 mouthpiece called OpIndia And Swarajy(these two are blacklisted by the Wikipedia). Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So you just continue with your personal attacks despite being asked to stop making personal attacks? We are not discussing Malayalam Wikipedia or English wikipedia here. Also, how are quotes about anti-Christian and anti-Hindu discrimination a "promotion of hatred"?
You seem to be saying that you will continue with your edit-warring and your removal of quotes "critical" of Congress politicians, while of course quotes "critical" about your political opponents and/or about Narendra Modi, the BJP, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, or whoever else you might dislike, can stay. These pages of politicians like Donald Trump or Joe Biden have many critical quotes. If you think there is a neutrality problem on any of them, the solution is to add quotes with a different pov. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have also in my last message to him said I will help him solve any issues. I told him: "Akhiljaxxn, if you have a concern about neutrality, if that is your concern, then selected quotes can be added to achieve neutrality. Please let me know if I can help you in doing that. " But he has not yet replied on any of the article talkpages. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 23:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Besides you, who else warned him? DawgDeputy (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He has deleted my talk page discussions, but since the user seems to have much experience also at other wikipedias, so assuming that he is aware that personal attacks of the kind that he has shown should not be made here (or anywhere else!) is probably correct assumption. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Like every other user, he has every right to remove anything from his talk page. And you were the only one ever sending him messages. Nevertheless, his point stands. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Which point? The only point he has made above are personal attacks (that I have asked him to stop because it wasn't his first time doing this). The only other point he made above is making personal attacks also against some others at other wikipedias (not only me).
I do not enjoy getting these personal attacks, that is why I have asked him to stop doing it. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote should be free from politics and religions. ALL quotes of notable people are welcome. We do have quotes of Hitler, for example, 'though many dislike 'em, but those are important to read to understand our history.--Vilho-Veli (talk) 00:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Despite multiple warnings, the user continues to add content citing their mouthpiece which is blacklisted by Wikipedia 1, 2, 3. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mouthpiece would mean that I control what gets published there. Since I don't have that control, this is another veiled personal attack on my alleged political views. Swarajya is not blacklisted on wikiquote, proof is that you were able to post links to the website. If it was blacklisted, you wouldn't have been able to do that! I already told you that! Swaraya seems to have been censored (temporarily?) either due to political bias or because as your links you posted show it may have published some articles critical of wikipedia. But what is censored on other websites has no bearing on this website. The deletions you made were either cases were the original source was something else and it is was only quoted from there, or where the quote is from an eminent politican like Swamy. Swarajya has made some interviews with very eminent politicians, intellectuals and scientists, and there is no reason not to quote these very eminent people from their own interviews. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 09:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Akhiljaxxn edit warring again[edit]

Akhiljaxxn (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) is edit warring again. See 1 2 and 1 and 2 etc at many other articles

He has also not replied on any of the article talkpages. I was the only one discussing on the article talk pages until now. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Admins, please have a look at the contribution of this above user and my comments above. The user has no idea about what is quotes and what cannot be used as quotes here. I don't know if I should take this issue to meta because I doubt this user uses multiple accounts on other Wikipedia also. The user exclusively edited Wikiquote by using this account, and every time he creates a new page like you can see here, here and here, one different user (User: Vilho-Veli) adding the links of those pages to its Wikipedia pages 1, 2, 3. I suspect either these two users are related nor the user may be blocked for socking on English Wikipedia in the past. That's why he does not edit Wikipedia by using this account. There is a lot of similarity in the account creation times 1, and their contribution 1, 2 of these two users. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vilho-Veli, as every admin knows (since he is very active here), is doing a lot of work here on wikiquote on ALL articles, not just the articles I'm editing. I'm not active on wikipedia (and either way, wikipedia is a different website so it is irrelevant what I do on a different website, which as I said is nothing). Is this another veiled personal attack? --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I check the links of EVERY new article.--Vilho-Veli (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how they are related, they don't have the same interests nor the same pattern in editing. Rupert Loup 22:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Well, is დამოკიდებულება able to translate Finnish proverbs?--Vilho-Veli (talk) 23:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report[edit]

--Samuele2002 (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

68.62.189.222[edit]

Previously blocked for vandalism on February 29, they have continued vandalising ([10] and [11]) despite numerous talk page warnings. Aranya (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report on rupert loup[edit]

rupert loup is once again edit warring. I have explained why I have made the edits I have made and I have asked him to take it to the talk page if he wants to discuss it further and he has refused and is edit warring. 120.158.152.91 03:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

81.152.162.50[edit]

Vandalism (not a LTA?) and harassment. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 06:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done (not by me). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker2[edit]

Vandalism and impersonation. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 06:43, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Y Done (not by me). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

72.252.4.114[edit]

Inserting an image of a hammer and sickle into 25 articles in a couple of minutes. Aranya (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, already done; globally blocked for xwiki vandalism --Aranya (talk) 00:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report[edit]

Typical nasty edit-warring IP vandal. Constantly tries to remove my warning templates on their talk page, see history [12] dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 10:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also death threat in edit summary. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Globally blocked, offending edit deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

96.238.130.65[edit]

Cross-wiki LTA; please also semi-protect targeted pages or they'll just use another proxy. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please revdel the edits also; this LTA loves to link to their edits from enwiki, e.g. [13]. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report[edit]

Adding controversial quotes made by them. Threats, accusations in edit summaries a la "you're brainwashed to the truth" (lol) dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 23:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal's IP changed to 197.251.240.223. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 23:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vandal's IP changed to 189.203.248.102. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 00:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Y Blocked (Non-admin closure) — by Kalki. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 00:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report[edit]

Check contribs, might need revision-deleting/edit-summary removal if we do that kind of thing here. Hurry—I'd forgotten how much hard work it was reverting trolls without rollback  :) it's a X-wiki abuser too, so maybe call a steward. All the best, ——SerialNumber54129 19:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done globally, tho some Oversighter has completely remove some of the edits and I cannot locally revdel the abusive edit summaries. Working with a WMF person to have those removed as well. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

86.173.1.15[edit]

LTA. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 11:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-05-29, 08:21[edit]

Obvious vandalism, edit warring. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 08:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also death threat in edit summary. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And this summary, a death threat too. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-05-29, 18:29[edit]

DawgDeputy won't stop shouting at me. 2606:A000:FC11:7400:C9AC:BDE:1C5D:8EDB 18:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of shouting prior to this frivolous report? DawgDeputy (talk) 20:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is, outside of these frivolous edits, which prove that you are a vandal and a sockpuppet. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-4, 22:46[edit]

Vandalism. Samuele2002 (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-7[edit]

The user keeps inserting a fabricated quote in a top level article at Muhammad. I have explained on the talkpage that the quote is by Bhai Bala, whose existence is disputed and whose writings are considered to be fabrications. At most, it could be moved to the Misattributed section, but it is not notable enough for this top level article.

The user keeps reinserting the quote without discussing on the talkpage.

I don't want to edit war and this is a top level article, so it needs attention from admins. დამოკიდებულება (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the edit [14] --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please ban User:დამოკიდებულება he keeps on removing sourced content. Also this is attributed to Guru Nanak as proven by the source here: [15] —This unsigned comment is by Indrooooz (talk • contribs) .

@Indrooooz: It seems like this issue of misattribution has already been covered at the article's talk page. As per my observations, the quote you're adding has been falsely attributed to Guru Nanak, and left without a source. It'd be best to leave this to discussion rather than edit warring. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 05:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dibbydib, please see my most recent comment in the talk page. If you look at the source it clearly states that Guru Nanak is being quoted within Bhai Bala. It is not fake. Indrooooz (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm coming to this a little late, but I'm looking thru დამოკიდებულება's edits and they seem very sensible. For that matter, this edit by Indrooooz includes some sensible changes, such as removing links to a wiki but also reinserts this spurious quotation from someone at Dhaka University with no actual attestation that anyone else can verify. This is a content dispute that got heated and I don't think merits blocking anyone as of yet but I am reverting to the last edit by დამოკიდებულება and protecting the page for awhile to encourage you two to post to talk. Please do so in a calm manner and ping me if you need me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Koavf, sikhiwiki is not a reliable source as per WP:RS. Also, this quote is from Guru Nanak. See the actual source here [[16]. On page 8 it clearly says Nanak is being quoted here. Indrooooz (talk) 20:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Indrooooz: I don't know why you are telling me this: I just wrote "Indrooooz did a good job by removing that wiki". I also don't know why you inserted a quotation where you have a citation for it but without the citation. Why are you posting this information here? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is good that Indroooz has started using the talkpage now. I have replied to Indrooz there. @Koavf:, the quote which was moved to talk here should be removed from the article because it clearly is offtopic and is about Muslims and not about Muhammad. This was already moved to the talkpage, but it was also reverted by Indrooz here.--დამოკიდებულება (talk) 08:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@დამოკიდებულება: Discussions about the content should be at the talk page. Please ping me if you need me there (by the way, your {{yo}} did not send me a notification). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-8[edit]

Xsaorapa keeps spamming dozens of articles with fact templates (to SOURCED quotes), copyright templates (without giving any evidence, proof and explanation on the talkpage as to why he thinks it is a violation, and which quote is a violation), and the NPOV templates (without explaining on the talkpage why he added it).

Some days ago, Xsaorapa has used a sock to give instructions to his meatpuppet (User:Pratap Pandit), who did exactly the same, but now the meatpuppet master is continuing the same. The way this is done is highly disruptive.

This is part of the history of personal attacks, harassment, hounding, stalking, intimidation and edit-warring, and of spreading false and misleading claims and outright lies, of this user. დამოკიდებულება (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And the user keeps making personal attacks on various pages.--დამოკიდებულება (talk) 09:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The spamming of the templates seems solely motivated by harassment, hounding, stalking and intimidation, and by censorship [17] [18] [19] [20] --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@დამოკიდებულება: I'm confused: edits like this are totally appropriate and the diffs you provided above this comment were performed by someone else. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This false report has been done in retaliation to this and this. --Xsaorapa (talk) 07:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Though this is not appropriate to warrant vandalism, I suggest moving discussion to the administrator's noticeboard. For the editors involved, don't fight fire with fire. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 07:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are several issues here. First, this is not done in good faith, but is part of a history of personal attacks, harassment, hounding, stalking and intimidation.

Here is a timeline of the past few days:

  1. On 16 May, Xsaorapa started giving meatpuppet instructions to User Pratap Pandit by using his sockpuppet User Sunfee over email and/or little used talkpages
  2. On 18 May, Pratap started mass templating articles edited by me or other users, which other users have called harassment. The first case was at Talk:Rajendran Narayanan.
  3. On 27 May, the meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry got exposed
  4. On 5 June, the meatpuppet master (Xsaorapa) took over from Pratap and started exactly the same mass templating that his meatpuppet Pratap did just some days before.

This is just plain harassment, hounding, stalking and intimidation. Maybe 80 percent of all quotes on WQ don't have entirely complete citations ("by preference", a complete citation should include Edition number, ISBN number, page number and other details) but they have sufficient details (Author, title of the book, year of publication,....). But Xsaorapa is very selective and only complains the users he is stalking. The meatpuppet did the same. "by preference" does not mean "mandatory".

Secondly, as I explained on Xsaorapa's talkpage (but he deleted it), this is not the right way to it.

Template:Fact is only for quotes with UNSOURCED statements. This tag will categorise tagged articles into Category:Articles with unsourced statements

But the templates were spammed to SOURCED quotes. All of the quotes are properly sourced, in conformity with the standards at wikiquote. There is no policy that says that the quotes are sourced wrongly. Wikiquote:Templates/People says that a citation should include author, co-authors and title (there are "optional clarifications").

I asked him to use the talkpage instead. If there is a genuine reason in good faith, he should simply state on the talkpage which quotation and book should be checked. (I have also started improving some of the citations). --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@დამოკიდებულება: You will make your case much better if you provide very pithy posts with directly relevant diffs. E.g. "User:x posted fact templates to sourced articles: [diff 1], [diff 2], [diff 3]." and that's it. Long posts with ALL CAPS SHOUTING and bold emphasis in the middle and no links to any actual malfeasance are not as compelling. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the formatting issues. I was copying text from his talkpage and other places, in which discussions I had to repeat obvious things.

Xsaorapa has been spamming spurious tags always with no rationale:

  • Spamming of fact template: for example here despite the fact that page numbers are included. Many more examples see his contributions starting from June 8 here.
    • As explained above, this is the wrong template for sourced quotes, the talkpage should be used instead
  • Spamming of copyvio template (see his edits here starting on June 5)
    • He should explain on the talkpage and give some rationale/proof/evidence for the claim which he has not done even once
  • Spamming of npov template
    • He is spamming the article mostly to articles of cases of genocide or massacres against Hindus. Examples are articles about the Bangladesh War genocide [21], the Partition of India genocide, the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiris, and of various articles related to cases of Islamist intolerance or persecution. (See here, most articles were added by Xsaorapa).

This seems to imply that he is concerned about quotes in which Hindus are described as victims of genocide or massacres. If a nazi user would spam the npov template to the Holocaust and World War II articles because there are too many quotes about Jewish victims, he would probably get blocked. But the analogy is not far off. This is what human rights activist Benkin writes about this analogy:

This book contains quite a few references to Nazi Germany, and there is a tendency for many people to discount such comparisons because they are so overused and often in simplistic and inappropriate ways. I am no less tolerant of such facile uses of a horrific set of events; and I find their overuse an insult to the memories of the victims. But I am using it rather extensively in this book precisely because the parallel is appropriate, certainly in the similar end foreseen by Islamists for Bengali Hindus and Nazis for Jews. If that recognition awakens the world to action, then this will be one of the most important uses of the comparison since World War II.

Xsaorapa has been spamming spurious tags always with no rationale, he was offering no rationale at all, neither on the talk page, nor anywhere else. That is disruptive, and the tags should be removed as clearly unjustified, in the absence of any concrete issues or evidence and proof raised on the talkpage. --დამოკიდებუილება2 (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-9, 02:34[edit]

@Ningauble: @GreenMeansGo: @UDScott: @Kalki: @Koavf:

It belittled me even though it clearly violated protocol repeatedly. Please take serious action against it, and strike its edit summaries. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-10, 05:04[edit]


Constant, long-term vandalism on List of The Simpsons crank calls (history • watch) . Also consider semi-protecting the page. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 06:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done Mostly. The first IP is not obviously a vandal. Edits like this are maybe not entirely correct but not as egregious as the other two IPs. If you have a diff I'm missing, show me. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:30, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: That IP did have similar traits to the others. Firstly, the user was solely contributing only to that article, and the user started editing Wikiquote at ~5:00 UTC and stopped at ~6:00, which is almost identical to 151.228.92.246's edit history. Also, this edit caught my eye as vandalism, although most of their other contributions were very subtle, though perhaps it was an attempt to "cloak" the previous vandalism. dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 09:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Obvious socking. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:13, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-13, 01:15[edit]

Vandalism. Samuele2002 (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done globally blocked. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal IP[edit]

2601:8b:c303:8ff0:942e:daf9:a8b3:f2bf (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log) Vandalism at Presidency of Donald Trump. Rupert Loup 00:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Y Done thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-16, 01:47[edit]

Delete my talk page too. Thank you! Stanglavine (talk) 01:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done thanks —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-23, 01:54[edit]

Vandalism --DannyS712 (talk) 01:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-26, 02:25[edit]

Just click on any one of them. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-27, 19:54[edit]

Creating pages out of project scope --DannyS712 (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-28, 20:45[edit]

Spam account. Rupert Loup 20:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Protection[edit]

Maybe it is time to start protecting articles like McDonald's. And please go through that and other articles to remove shit like a username here, an edit summary here and here, etc. User:UDScott, you've semi-protected this before, I see. Please. And there's a couple more. Drmies (talk) 20:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-06-30, 23:15[edit]

Vandalism. Samuele2002 (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-07-2, 23:15[edit]

A vandal crossing from Commons, using his talkpage as a forum to launch insults to Coomons users. Tm (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-07-4, 04:07[edit]

Vandalism only --DannyS712 (talk) 04:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report on DawgDeputy[edit]

I found evidence that he might (not for sure) be sockpuppeting and reported it to the Administrators' noticeboard. Instead of responding in a civil manner, he started to vandalize or remove my edits four times. Additionally, given his history of inappropriate behavior on Wikipedia at Wikipedia:User:DawgDeputy, I believe that a global block of at least one month is in order.

Edit: Look through his history, he is still deleting my edits instead of responding. At least a dozen times.

Edit 2: The fact that he is extremely hostile probably proves that he is sockpuppeting like I initially claimed

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=2820537#User:DawgDeputy's_potential_sockpuppetry

Evidence:

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&type=revision&diff=2820543&oldid=2820537

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=2820550

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=2820565

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=2820578

Although this is old sockpuppet evidence, I tried to submit it before and it was removed for some reason.

He also claimed he could ban me on my talkpage, though he's not an admin, and kept vandalizing:

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AYlevental&type=revision&diff=2820572&oldid=2525010

https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ylevental&diff=next&oldid=2820574

Ylevental (talk) 11:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GreenMeansGo:
@Koavf:
@UDScott:
@Kalki:
@Vermont:

Ylevental (talk) 15:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ylevental: This is for vandalism, not sockpuppetry. We don't have local CheckUsers here so if there needed to be an investigation, it would have to go to m:Stewards. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:59, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: Thanks for letting me know. What is the best way to contact them? Ylevental (talk) 21:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ylevental: Anyone is free to post there and ask for stewards' assistance, I think that it's probably wiser to see if other admins think there's a problem here worth investigating. I personally don't. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: For the record, I am completely innocent of all Ylevental's so-called "wrongdoings". TLPG and I are not the same person. We may both have the same ambitions, which is undoing unnecessary submissions, but we are clearly different people. DawgDeputy is the one and only account I use here. Plus, I looked through TLPG's edits, and there are a lot of edits he made that I would never do, such as submit to M*A*S*H (TV series). I know too little of that series. I never even made a major edit there (let alone any at all). Most of those other pages-- I only made edits to help prevent problematic edits. This case has been frivolous beyond frivolous from the very beginning. That is why I kept trying to delete Ylevental's false report. But it persistently continues to reinstate it without solid evidence. Plus, non-admins have every right to post a warning on a problematic user's talk page (even though blocking is up to an administrator), but unlike most users, this one does not seem to understand. DawgDeputy (talk) 22:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DawgDeputy: I still think you should have waited for an admin to respond instead of forcibly deleting it... If there's not enough evidence, then there's not enough evidence. Ylevental (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ylevental: I know a false report when I see one, and yours was no exception. Why file a report when you know that it has no irrefutable evidence against me? DawgDeputy (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There was significant overlap. No reason to act the way you did. Ylevental (talk) 23:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Significant overlap"? A vast majority of our edits were completely different. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ylevental[edit]

Ylevental (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

@GreenMeansGo:
@Koavf:
@UDScott:
@Kalki:
@Vermont:

Persistently falsely accuses me and TLPG (among other users) of sockpuppetry without hard, relevant, irrefutable evidence other than its easily-refutable say-so. I request it be blocked indefinitely before it goes after another innocent user.

And furthermore, non-admins are allowed to send warnings to problematic users. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:59, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DawgDeputy: This is for vandalism, not low-level harassment and annoyances. Thanks for your work in stopping and spotting other vandals. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: I didn't know that there were no checkusers here, honest Ylevental (talk) 21:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

73.37.237.49 is back[edit]

73.37.237.49 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

And it has learned nothing from its previous blocks. This time, I request it be blocked indefinitely. One year is not enough anymore. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ningauble:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Koavf:
@Kalki:
@UDScott:
It continues to persist despite my warnings. Like I said, a year's blocking does not end its reign of vandalism. It only adds fuel to its fire. I request at years two years' worth of blocking against it. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-07-23, 10:56[edit]

Continued vandalism after 2 warnings, tends to hide them under legitimate edits. See [22] [23] [24] [25] dibbydib 10:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-07-24, 18:36[edit]

Link spammer IP. Rupert Loup 18:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-07-29, 19:09[edit]

Persistent vandalism at 32 article. Rupert Loup 19:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-3, 08:03[edit]

Link spammers. Rupert Loup 08:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

168.11.166.18[edit]

168.11.166.18 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)

Nothing but vandalism and general all-around protocol violation. In addition to long-term blocking, indefinite protection on all the articles it vandalized. DawgDeputy (talk) 14:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done Blocked for six months. Edits like this are either vandalism or just too low of quality to be acceptable. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I haven't protected the pages yet but will if you see more IP vandalism. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

153.107.33.11[edit]

153.107.33.11 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • GUC • stalktoy • RBLs • block user • block log)

All edits are vandalism. Ahmad252 (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done --DannyS712 (talk) 04:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-4, 08:29[edit]

"Cheese" vandal back at it again on another IP dibbydib 08:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked --DannyS712 (talk) 08:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-20, 07:11[edit]

Doxxer kiddy back - oversight the edits too. Contact ISP if not using a VPN? dibbydib 08:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: IP belongs to Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Contact emails are also in the WHOIS.

Globally blocked already --DannyS712 (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism on...[edit]

...the following pages:

Journey Beyond Sodor
Are We There Yet? (film)
Big World! Big Adventures!
An Extremely Goofy Movie
The Adventure Begins‎
Thomas & Friends: The Great Race
And numerous seasons of Thomas & Friends beyond season 7.
@UDScott:
@Ningauble:
@Koavf:
@GreenMeansGo:
@Kalki:
A bunch of persistent IP vandals who do not understand the term: "You cannot fix what is not broken". I request indefinite blocking of these IPs and indefinite protection on the listed articles so this never happens again. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-21, 20:59[edit]

Persistent vandalism. Rupert Loup 21:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Nuked, warned --DannyS712 (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-24, 14:07[edit]

Obvious vandalism of page for William Tecumseh Sherman. Description has been replaced with "boo hoo" and timeline/history/externals, and all other categories replaced with information about Fortnite. The user has commented that they are a "bad boy" and singing "booo hooo".

71.205.5.20 14:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Feminism[edit]

Clear vandalism on Feminism page with Dfgbhjbf. --Superpes15 (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2601:201:280:1020:F523:D3C3:905C:BB9C[edit]

Repeated vandalisms --Superpes15 (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has now been blocked for 3 months. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-29, 08:32[edit]

Spam. Majavah (talk) 08:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please also add pickshortquotes\.com to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. Thanks. Majavah (talk) 09:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-08-30, 04:01[edit]

Persistent vandalism. Rupert Loup 04:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

New report 2020-08-31, 18:47[edit]

Vandalism on Cinderella (1950 film) and Pinocchio (1940 film). Can I Log In (talk) 18:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-09-4, 07:20[edit]

Link spammer. Rupert Loup 07:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

New report 2020-09-6, 00:22[edit]

Content removal. Isabelle Belato (talk) 00:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-09-8, 07:31[edit]

Only vandalism. Mtarch11 (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andreibobo##[edit]

@Ningauble: @UDScott: @Kalki:

Andreibobo09 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Andreibobo11 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Andreibobo15 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Andreibobo19 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
2605:6000:1022:78A:A4D5:1E06:BCE2:A569‎ (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

These sockpuppet vandals keep undoing my reversion of vandalism. This has to stop. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to block Andreibobo15. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should all be done. Feel free to ping me for these in the future --DannyS712 (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyS712:
We have another sockpuppet in the form of...
Andreibobo24 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Not only block this vandal, but protect the pages the vandal vandalized indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked, protected for a month for now. If it comes back once the month is over will do for longer; I'm also watching the page now --DannyS712 (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2601:240:4180:6A50:2044:867A:A4EC:EBA6‎[edit]

2601:240:4180:6A50:2044:867A:A4EC:EBA6‎ (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

This persistent IP vandalizes pages and claimed after my first warning against them that they would not do it again, but afterwards, the vandal immediately went back on their word. All pages the vandal vandalized must be indefinitely protected, and the vandal blocked. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-09-25, 03:35[edit]

LTA --Mtarch11 (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Angie williamz[edit]

Constantly vandalizes pages and falsely accuses admins of cruelty. This user needs to be blocked indefinitely (and that includes all talk pages). DawgDeputy (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And an obvious sockpuppet of:

DawgDeputy (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done — this user has now been permanently blocked. ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 13:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-5, 19:52[edit]

A sockpuppet of Angelique Angie Davids. Block her infinitely and deny her talk page editing. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-10, 21:28[edit]

I think User:Rupert loup should be blocked for a while. He keeps reverting and redirecting whole pages (e.g. Fatwa, Racism in the Arab world) and removes large parts of other pages without discussion (e.g. Joseph Goebbels, Hindu-Islamic relations). Maybe some content on the pages needs to be removed or improved, but this kind of extremely aggressive editing is disruptive. Also see Wikiquote:Administrators' noticeboard#Asking for an independent admin look. -- Chrisahn (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done Between questionable actions on the other thread and outright edit-warring just on Fatwa alone, he's not engaging in a collaborative spirit. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Justin. I was just about to write the comments that I'm adding below:

Rupert has made 5 reverts in less than 7 hours at Racism in the Arab world (see [26]), and edit-warring at Fatwa and many other articles. Last time he broke the 3RR rule was just some days ago as I noted here [27].

Rupert has shown extremely aggressive behaviour and abrasive edit-warring in recent days, and there were clear warnings given to Rupert loup:

--დამოკიდებულება (talk) 22:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-10, 23:03[edit]

Presumably block evasion by User:Rupert loup (see above). Childish attacks on me, e.g. Special:Diff/2872508 and Special:Diff/2872503. If the vandalism persists, the IP probably should be blocked. Chrisahn (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-11[edit]

Obvious block evasion by User talk:Xsaorapa used for vandalism and personal attacks. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 11:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I request this vandal be range-blocked.

Many of the IP socks use this range:

--დამოკიდებულება (talk) 19:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyo Metro 6000 series[edit]

@Koavf: @UDScott: @Kalki: @Ningauble:

Tokyo Metro 6000 series (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)

Completely ruined Ralph Breaks the Internet. I attempted to rename it to its original, but the vandal in question had already done the damage. I request that this vandal be banned for life, and all of its edits struck down as if they never existed. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And the following IP only added to the problem:
2601:240:4180:6A50:C5AF:B46F:E2C:C8CD (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) DawgDeputy (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I clicked on several edits from the IP and they seemed fine. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But when it came to fixing Ralph Breaks the Internet, the IP added to the problem and by turning a blind eye. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it did: I didn't see that. It's stale now but if the IP causes more problems, let me know. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-13, 23:08[edit]

Posting unauthorized caricatures of real people, awarding false barnstars to administrators, block evasion, and likely spreading an agenda. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that this is vandalism as such so I've warned the user. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-14, 02:12[edit]

Disruptive editing. Clearing the contents of the page.--Saroj Uprety (talk) 02:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-18, 08:34[edit]

Spamming links to external sites--Saroj Uprety (talk) 08:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:57, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-19, 13:09[edit]

Constantly changes the voice actors of the Winnie the Pooh series to a bunch of nonsense, depending on the Winnie the Pooh project. DawgDeputy (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And the problem persists. I request immediate action be taken against this vandal and call pages this vandal vandalized be protected indefinitely. DawgDeputy (talk) 11:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-20[edit]

Obvious block evasion by User talk:Xsaorapa. User is blocked on 3 wikipedias for personal attacks, hounding, harassment and socking.

Same spurious tag bombing, always with no rationale (apart from boilerplate edit summary), see also Talk:Rajendran Narayanan, while offering no rationale at all on the talkpage. That is disruptive.

I request this sock be range-blocked.

Many of the IP socks of Xsaorapa use the same IP range 192.190.19.0/32:

დამოკიდებულება (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-20, 10:31[edit]

Clearing the contents of the page. Spamming links to external sites.--Saroj Uprety (talk) 11:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-10-26, 18:48[edit]

@UDScott: @Koavf: @Tegel: @Kalki: @Ningauble:

This sockpuppet IP consistently vandalizes Aladdin (1992 Disney film), and consistently lies about not doing it again. Plus, this IP tried to censor Snakes on a Plane without explanation. I request not only indefinite blocking, but revocation of editing talk pages. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This IP is clearly ignoring our messages like before. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at several edits and they were actually constructive. I agree that the attempted censorship is not helpful and borderline vandalism (I don't think the intent is vandalism but the outcome is). Hence, indefinite block with talk page access revoked seems excessive. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But the edits to Aladdin (1992 Disney film) was anything but constructive. Those unnecessary cast members the IP added were nothing but a hinderance and add nothing to the article. It had been a problem for the past two months. I know this IP will hop to another and do it again, so I recommend long-term protection of that article. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not every bad edit is "vandalism". Censoring content is definitely vandalism in its outcome, if not its intent but adding extraneous cast members is not "vandalism". I'm happy to protect the article and I'm happy that you're patrolling these pages but choosing one edit out of several that were constructive and mischaracterizing it as vandalism is not useful. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, even though it was not vandalism, it was still extraneous and unnecessary, and I do believe there is such a thing as an edit that is neither vandalism nor good faith. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-11-16, 02:33[edit]

@Koavf:
@Tegel:
@UDScott:
@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Saroj Uprety:
@DannyS712:
Clearly a remorseless sockpuppet of the following IPs (notorious for adding false categories and whatnot without explanation):
2601:240:4180:6A50:CCF:D7F9:78F1:FAB1‎ (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
2601:240:4180:6A50:60D9:CE91:D523:11E1 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
2601:240:4180:6a50:6940:a401:458b:539c (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
2601:240:4180:6A50:4939:AA83:4CA2:E97D (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
98.214.101.235 (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
And it only gets worse. When these IPs are not adding nonsense categories, they also add nonsense members of the cast, particularly in films involving Patrick Warburton.
And I chose not to give the new sockpuppet IP a warning, lest the IP send an inadequate apology for the IP's history of vandalism. The IP vandal is beyond redemption. I request a global range block against this vandal and denial of access to talk pages, and indefinite protection of all pages they touched. DawgDeputy (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
IPs blocked, no rangeblock, no protections The IPs were obviously most disruptive (tho there were some good edits in there). re: rangeblock: what range? How to do it? re: Protections: that's a lot of overhead for a lot of one-off edits (e.g. Courteney Cox). If someone else wants to do the other two tasks, God bless you but it's not something I can take on now. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2601:240:4180:6A50:3551:B917:4BCD:938A‎ (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log)
Another sockpuppet. This has to stop. Protect all those pages for no less than a year. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What is the vandalism? This is not vandalism, nor is this. You have to be more helpful here @DawgDeputy:. You have written several poorly-formatted reports that require myself or other admins to do more forensics than are necessary and you make some exceptional demands on us as well. While in general, you are helpful here, posting "[x] is a vandal" is not helpful unless it is obvious that all of his edits are vandalism. As of now, I don't see any vandalism and this IP has made over 100 edits. You have clearly seen some diffs that you think constitute vandalism so go ahead and show me which ones they are. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is vandalism. The vandal believes that Ming-Na Wen did Mulan's singing voice, but it was only done by Lea Salonga. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And it even made false death threats towards me on its talk page and falsely claims it is an administrator. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And the IP is clearly mocking me on the talk page. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And it gets worse from here. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Plus, the IP never signs. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And Tigger in a Phineas & Ferb project?! What is going on in this IP's head?! DawgDeputy (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Being mistaken is not vandalism nor is not signing talk pages but violent threats are 100% totally unacceptable and have been reported to the WMF. Additionally, you have clearly demonstrated that some of these edits are inserting false information. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure. And I apologize for going a bit overboard, calling wrong edits/not signing vandalism. I should have used the term "problematic", since those edits were neither vandalism nor good faith. Just somewhere in between. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And since that user's threats were reported to the WMF, hopefully that user will never return. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to have you around. Thanks again. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-11-26, 03:56[edit]

Vandalism. Mtarch11 (talk) 03:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done. — this account has been permanently blocked. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 04:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-11-30, 12:01[edit]

Persistent Vandalism on Joe Biden and Christian Drosten.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-12-7, 02:47[edit]

Vandalism つがる (talk) 02:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done DannyS712 (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-12-10, 16:16[edit]

They harrassed 2603:6080:a608:500:c4a7:879:c426:975b for being constructive. 152.26.199.24 16:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The anon IP I initially blocked (2603:6080:A608:500:C4A7:879:C426:975B (talk · contributions) exhibited some standard trolling and vandal behavior, with their very first edit summary stating: "This is an edit you cannot and will not revert!" The content of the pages were moved to titles not matching the corresponding Wikipedia pages, and I restored them to the standard matching titles. I just happened to check in again just moments after the IP 152.26.199.24 became active, and noted the remarks on my talk page, but other apparent trolling activity, including the remarks here prompted me to block that IP. I did restore some of the very slight formatting improvements to one of the pages, made by the previous IP prior to one of the page moves, but rejected the non-standard coloration of text and non-standard page moves. I was only very briefly checking in, and will not be able to stick around long. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 16:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC) + tweaks[reply]

New report 2020-12-14, 16:16[edit]

Obvious block evasion by User talk:Xsaorapa who is blocked on wikiquote. User is blocked on at least 3 wikipedias for personal attacks, hounding, harassment, blp violations and socking, and pov-pushing antisemitic conspiracy theories about 9/11, neocons or the mossad.

I request this sock be range-blocked.

Many of the IP socks of Xsaorapa use the same 192.190.19.0/24 range

The whole range is blocked on wikipedia as a blocked open proxy.

Another one

New report 2020-12-14, 15:45[edit]

Incorrect edits, moving user pages, recreating deleted user pages. Clearly not here to help. Also, vandalism in other wikis.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still ongoing vandalism.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 17:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done by ~riley DannyS712 (talk) 04:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-12-14, 18:40[edit]

Vandalism-only account. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 19:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done by ~riley DannyS712 (talk) 04:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-12-20, 00:16[edit]

@Koavf:
@Tegel:
@UDScott:
@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Saroj Uprety:
@DannyS712:

Filing a false report against Kalki, asking meaningless questions, taunting others, and harassment, among other things. DawgDeputy (talk) 00:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And please strike all of this IP's edit summaries, as they are completely inappropriate (in fact, strike their edits completely and make it look as if the IP never existed). DawgDeputy (talk) 00:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I want to chime in and add that this vandal is probably a weird troll, but their edits are all completely inappropriate and constitute vandalism. The anonymous user also posted an implied threat on my talk page that I copied and pasted in a notice about this I put on UDScott's talk page. --AC9016 (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The blocking process is done. There is still the matter of striking the user's inappropriate edit summaries. DawgDeputy (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've hidden the ones that seemed inappropriate. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are a LOT of inappropriate edit summaries, including embarassing, phony love confessions. DawgDeputy (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I've hidden that one too - although I considered that to be more amusing than inappropriate. Let me know if there are others to which you object. ~ UDScott (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Amusing? It was humiliating, as was the summary in the link. DawgDeputy (talk) 16:12, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-12-20, 01:00[edit]

@Koavf:
@Tegel:
@UDScott:
@Ningauble:
@Kalki:
@Saroj Uprety:
@DannyS712:

Randomly posts caricatures to further an agenda, files false reports, calls admins "useless", and mocks my name. This user must be blocked indefinitely, and all of its edits be stricken from the record.

And it is a sockpuppet of vandal Oohtqejjhh. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Again, when you block this user, also strike all of the user's edits, as well as the edits of its original account. I do not want any trace of it left. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The blocking process is done. There is still the matter of striking the user's inappropriate edits. DawgDeputy (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The user should also be denied talk page access, permanently. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have permanently blocked the account as primarily engaged in vandalism and trolling, and likely one of the long-term vandals here who quite wrongly perceive it to be an admirable thing to engage in infantile behaviors. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 21:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And now the vandal is back in the form of Diasmanozy. I request it be blocked and all of its edits be stricken as if nothing happened.
Diasmanozy (talk • contribs • global edits • page moves • block user • block log) DawgDeputy (talk) 22:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done by someone else. Thanks, Double D. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If that vandal ever returns, I recommend that user be blocked globally. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's work for stewards. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New report 2020-12-25, 10:48[edit]

In this article he has removed multiple paragraphs. 2405:204:5403:D371:C804:6E8A:A208:4C22 10:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems simply an editorial dispute, with the paragraphs moved from the "Kafir" page to "People of the Book" page. It does not seem to be an act of deliberate vandalism. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 11:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
She/He has removed matter from the People of the Book article also
The removal which is apparent in the recent edit there was simply a removal of a duplicated entry of Surah 98. ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 11:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Vandalism_in_progress/Archive/9&oldid=2930170"